Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959612›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2020

Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol.

Marta Ballester, Carola Orrego, Monique Heijmans, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Matthijs Michaël Versteegh, Dimitri Mavridis, O Groene, Kaisa Immonen, Cordula Wagner, Carlos Canelo-Aybar and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Effect of Health Literacy Interventions on Self-management in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Talking the same language on patient empowerment: Development and content validation of a taxonomy of self-management interventions for chronic conditions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marta BallesterAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain mballester@fadq.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7803-8354
Carola OrregoAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.
Monique HeijmansNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pablo Alonso-CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Matthijs Michaël VersteeghInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dimitri MavridisDepartment of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
O GroeneOptiMedis AG, Hamburg, Germany.
Kaisa ImmonenEuropean Patients' Forum, Brussels, Belgium.
Cordula WagnerNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carlos Canelo-AybarIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa SunolAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.
COMPAR-EU consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPopulation ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited.

aimTo identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,and heart failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisEuropeHumansPrimary Health CareSelf-Managementhealth economicsprotocols & guidelinespublic healthqualitative researchstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID31959612
PMCPMC7044921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.