Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959546›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2020

Comprehensive Assessment of Immuno-oncology Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma, Urothelial Carcinoma, and Squamous-cell Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Andrea Necchi, Russell Madison, Daniele Raggi, Joseph M Jacob, Gennady Bratslavsky, Oleg Shapiro, Julia A Elvin, Jo-Anne Vergilio, Jonathan K Killian, Nhu Ngo and 13 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.necchi@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Russell MadisonFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniele RaggiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Joseph M JacobUpstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Gennady BratslavskyUpstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Oleg ShapiroUpstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Julia A ElvinFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jo-Anne VergilioFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jonathan K KillianFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nhu NgoFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shakti RamkissoonFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eric SeversonFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Amanda C HemmerichFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Richard HuangFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Siraj M AliFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jon H ChungFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Prasanth ReddyFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Vincent A MillerFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alexa B SchrockFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Laurie M GayFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Brian M AlexanderFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Petros GrivasUniversity of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Foundation Medicine (United States)SUNY Upstate Medical University · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with rare histologies of bladder cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the bladder (ACB) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC), there are limited standard therapy options, defining an unmet medical need.

objectiveIn this comparative comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) study, genomic alterations (GAs), and immuno-oncology (IO) biomarkers have been analyzed. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWithin the Foundation Medicine database, 143 cases with centrally reviewed pure ACB, 2142 with pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), and 83 with pure SCC were subjected to CGP. All patients developed advanced disease following a primary diagnosis of bladder cancer.

interventionCGP using a hybrid capture-based assay and immunohistochemistry (IHC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA, and microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on 114 loci. Programmed cell-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was determined by IHC (Ventana SP-142 assay), with >1% tumor cells (TCs) or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) scoring positive. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Pure ACB patients were younger and more often female than pure UC and pure SCC patients. UC and SCC had a significantly higher median TMB than ACB (p < 0.001). Rare CD274 (PD-L1) amplification cases were more frequently seen in SCC than in UC (5% vs 1%), and were not seen in ACB. MSI high status was very uncommon in all tumor types (0-1%). The frequencies of PD-L1 expression in both TCs and TILs was higher in UC and SCC (both 30%) than in ACB (18%). The results are limited by their retrospective nature and lack of clinical data annotation.

conclusionsDeep sequencing revealed significant differences in IO biomarkers among the three major subtypes of bladder carcinomas. UC and SCC revealed higher frequencies of PD-L1 expression and higher TMB than ACB, and SCC has the highest frequency of CD274 amplification. The presence of pure SCC features should not disqualify patients for inclusion in IO trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: Tumor samples from patients diagnosed with advanced pure adenocarcinoma of the bladder (ACB) or pure squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) have been analyzed in terms of frequency of putative immunotherapy biomarkers. The results indicated that pure SCC of the bladder was characterized by genomic features that portend similar response possibilities to immunotherapy compared with the classical pure urothelial carcinoma. Conversely, for pure ACB there might be different therapeutic opportunities, such as targeted therapies against peculiar genomic alterations in selected patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleGenetic ProfileGenomeHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBladder adenocarcinomaBladder squamous-cell carcinomaGenomic alterationsImmunotherapy biomarkersVariant histologies

Identifiers

PMID31959546
OpenAlexW2999032151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.