Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959389›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020

Comparison of a portable balance board for measures of persistence in postural sway.

Zachary S Meade, Vivien Marmelat, Mukul Mukherjee, Takashi Sado, Kota Z Takahashi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary S MeadeCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
Vivien MarmelatDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
Mukul MukherjeeDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
Takashi SadoDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
Kota Z TakahashiDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States. Electronic address: ktakahashi@unomaha.edu.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · US

Funding

Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI STERGIOU, NIKOLAOS · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 18AIREA33960251NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring postural sway is important for determining functional ability or risk of falling. Gathering postural sway measures outside of controlled environments is desirable for reaching populations with limited mobility. Previous studies have confirmed the accuracy of the magnitude of postural sway using the Nintendo Wii Balance Board (WBB). However, it is unclear if the WBB can accurately measure persistence of postural sway, i.e., the pattern of center-of-pressure fluctuations over time. The purpose of this study was to compare measures of persistence of postural sway (through detrended fluctuation analysis) using WBB and a force platform (FP). Seventeen healthy individuals performed three standing conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, and one-leg standing. The WBB (30 Hz) was placed on top on the FP (600 Hz) to collect data simultaneously, then the FP data were downsampled to 100 Hz and 30 Hz. The agreement between WBB and FP for measures of postural sway were influenced by the sampling rate and postural sway direction. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (range: 0.953-0.998) for long-term scaling regions in the anterior-posterior direction, but lower (range: 0.352-0.877) and inconsistent for medial-lateral direction and short-term scaling regions. The three comparison groups (WBB at 30 Hz, FP at 30 Hz, and FP at 100 Hz) showed dissimilar abilities in detecting differences in persistence of postural sway. In summary, the WBB is accurate for quantifying persistence of postural sway measurements in long-term scaling regions in the AP direction, but has limitations for short-term scaling regions and the ML direction.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceVideo GamesAccidental FallsFemaleHumansMaleStanding PositionCenter of pressureDetrended fluctuation analysisNintendoVariabilityWii Balance Board

Identifiers

PMID31959389
PMCPMC7343580
OpenAlexW2997651684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.