Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959291›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2020

Convergent extension in the amphibian, Xenopus laevis.

Ray Keller, Ann Sutherland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional genomics iniScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Differential sensitivity of midline development to mitosis during and after primitive streak extension.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ray KellerDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States. Electronic address: rek3k@virginia.edu.
Ann SutherlandDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

Funding

Vangl2 function in mammalian convergent extensionR01HD087093 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SUTHERLAND, ANN E · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is a comprehensive analysis of the cell biology and biomechanics of Convergent Extension in Xenopus.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGastrulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMorphogenesisAnimalsEmbryo, NonmammalianGastrulaSignal TransductionXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsXenopus ProteinsConvergent extensionGastrulationXenopus

Identifiers

PMID31959291
PMCPMC7132997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.