ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020
Developing a tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare rescuers: a modified Delphi study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing the scale to measure financial toxicity in cancer patients for Low-middle income countries (FT-LM) by using the modified Delphi method.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Development of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measurement tool for abortion care in Ethiopia: a mixed-method study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Disaster readiness and resilience among emergency medical service providers: a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Development and consensus-based validation of a comprehensive population survey instrument for municipal crisis preparedness: a three-round Delphi study (KOMPAKT112).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development of an evaluation framework for a lifestyle management model among Chinese MASLD patients under the concept of physical and medical integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of digital channels on public health services to enhance city resilience during the public health emergency response in Thailand (2020-2023).BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Validation of the Eyesi Slit Lamp Simulator for a Simulated Training Curriculum for Residents in Ophthalmology: A National Delphi study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Development and preliminary validation of the evaluation scale for nurses' core emergency response abilities in sudden major infectious disease outbreaks.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk perception scale on acute respiratory infections for caregivers in long-term care facilities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Minimum data set harmonization in the management of cross-border Multi Casualty Incidents. Modified Delphi (VALKYRIES-H2020 project).PloS one · 2024Article
- Post-traumatic stress and depression following disaster: examining the mediating role of disaster resilience.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Construction of Pain Management Strategies After Hepatectomy: Evidence Summary and Delphi Study.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- The Development and Validation of Multi-dimensional Resilience Scale for People Living with HIV in China.AIDS and behavior · 2023Article
- Development of the peer-supported open dialogue attitude and competence inventory for practitioners: A Delphi study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Developing an Exercise Attitudes and Behavior Intentions Questionnaire for Survivors of Aortic Dissection: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Acute Stress Response Profiles in Health Workers Facing SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Resilience in a prehospital setting - a new focus for future research?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Review
- Psychological resilience among emergency medical teams in Singapore.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisaster resilience is an essential personal characteristics of health rescue workers to respond to disasters in an effective manner, and maintain a state of adaptation after deployment. It is essential for disaster managers to recruit, assess, and prepare healthcare rescuers with this characteristic. A specific tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare rescuers has yet to be devised.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to establish the content validity of a tool for measuring the disaster resilience of disaster rescue workers.
methodsA modified Delphi approach was employed. Experts in disaster work and research were invited to rate the domains and items of a prototype tool for measuring disaster resilience in healthcare rescue workers. The panel of experts rated the relevance of the items using a 4-point Likert scale. The median and interquartile range, as well as the level of agreement, were calculated for each item using the Kendall coefficient W, to assess the consensus of the experts. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated to assess the content validity of this tool.
resultsA total of 22 and 21 experts were involved in the first and second rounds of this modified Delphi study (response rate of 91.7 and 95.5%), respectively. After two rounds of expert query, an eight-domain and 27-item disaster resilience measuring tool was established. The median range of all of the included items was 3.50 to 4.00 and the interquartile range was 0.00 to 1.00, and all items achieved ≥85% agreement. The Kendall coordination coefficient W was 0.21 and 0.33 in the first and second rounds, respectively, with P < 0.01. The I-CVI ranged from 0.85 to 1.0, while the S-CVI/UA and S-CVI /Ave were 0.69 and 0.97, respectively.
conclusionConsensus was reached on a disaster resilience measuring tool covering 27 items. The content validity of this tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare rescuers was excellent. This tool is validated and ready to be tested in a pilot study to assess its psychometric properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.