Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959213›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2020

Government policy and agricultural production: a scoping review to inform research and policy on healthy agricultural commodities.

Raphael Lencucha, Nicole E Pal, Adriana Appau, Anne-Marie Thow, Jeffrey Drope

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Implications for farmers of measures to reduce sugars consumption.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Raphael LencuchaSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada. raphael.lencucha@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9273-2027
Nicole E PalFaculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Adriana AppauResearch and Evaluation, PolicyWise for Children and Families, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anne-Marie ThowMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jeffrey DropeEconomic and Health Policy Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, USA.
American Cancer Society · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAPolicyWise for Children & Families · CAThe University of Sydney · AUVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

The Political Economy of Tobacco Farming in Low-and Middle-Income CountriesR01TW010898 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DROPE, JEFFREY · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Building Research and Capacity on the Economic Policy-Tobacco Control Nexus in AfR01DA035158 · NIDA · AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC. · PI DROPE, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010898NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035158NIDA NIH HHS R01DA035158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unhealthy foods and tobacco remain the leading causes of non-communicable disease (NCDs). These are key agricultural commodities for many countries, and NCD prevention policy needs to consider how to influence production towards healthier options. There has been little scholarship to bridge the agriculture with the public health literature that seeks to address the supply of healthy commodities. This scoping review synthesizes the literature on government agricultural policy and production in order to 1) present a typology of policies used to influence agricultural production, 2) to provide a preliminary overview of the ways that impact is assessed in this literature, and 3) to bring this literature into conversation with the literature on food and tobacco supply.This review analyzes the literature on government agricultural policy and production. Articles written in English and published between January 1997 and April 2018 (20-year range) were included. Only quantitative evaluations were included. Studies that collected qualitative data to supplement the quantitative analysis were also included. One hundred and three articles were included for data extraction. The following information was extracted: article details (e.g., author, title, journal), policy details (e.g., policy tools, goals, context), methods used to evaluate the policy (e.g., outcomes evaluated, sample size, limitations), and study findings. Fifty four studies examined the impact of policy on agricultural production. The remaining articles assessed land allocation (n = 25) (e.g., crop diversification, acreage expansion), efficiency (n = 23), rates of employment including on- and off-farm employment (n = 18), and farm income (n = 17) among others. Input supports, output supports and technical support had an impact on production, income and other outcomes. Although there were important exceptions, largely attributed to farm level allocation of labour or resources. Financial supports were most commonly evaluated including cash subsidies, credit, and tax benefits. This type of support resulted in an equal number of studies reporting increased production as those with no effects.This review provides initial extrapolative insights from the general literature on the impact of government policies on agricultural production. This review can inform dialogue between the health and agricultural sector and evaluative research on policy for alternatives to tobacco production and unhealthy food supply.

Indexed as

GovernmentPolicyAgricultureHumansResearchAgricultureFood policyGlobal health policyNon-communicable diseaseReviewTobaccoTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID31959213
PMCPMC6971899
OpenAlexW3013478305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.