Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959178›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2020

Smokers or non-smokers: who benefits more from immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of malignancies? An up-to-date meta-analysis.

Jiahang Mo, Xiao Hu, Lihu Gu, Bangsheng Chen, Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo, Zefeng Shen, Lei Dong, Yuqi Lv, Marylin Nyaradzo Chitumba, Jiequan Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Panorama of Chromosomal Instability in Lung Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiahang MoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Xiao HuSchool of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Lihu GuDepartment of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Bangsheng ChenEmergency Medical Center, The Second Hospital of Yinzhou, 998 North Qianhe Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315100, China.
Parikshit Asutosh KhadarooMonash University School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.
Zefeng ShenThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Lei DongDepartment of Pneumology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Yuqi LvThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Marylin Nyaradzo ChitumbaInternational Education College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Jiequan LiuEmergency Medical Center, The Second Hospital of Yinzhou, 998 North Qianhe Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315100, China. Yinzhouno1@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-914X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors, which are a milestone in anti-cancer therapy, have been applied in the treatment of multiple malignancies. Real-world data have suggested that smoking status may be associated with the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Hereby, to evaluate "smoking benefit or not", we included numerous high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) without any restriction on category.

methodsA systematic search of online database was performed from July 2010 to July 2019. Eligible studies included phase II/III RCTs comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple carcinomas and contained subgroup analysis of smoking status. Then, related hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were pooled.

resultsIn the initial meta-analysis, compared with chemotherapy, the OS of non-smokers (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98) and smokers (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83) were significantly prolonged with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Outcomes from subgroup analysis showed that in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy groups, non-smokers showed no significant improvement in OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.06), while the OS of smokers was significantly prolonged (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85); in groups of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, the OS of non-smokers (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71) and smokers (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85) were significantly prolonged. Combined ipilimumab and chemotherapy showed no significance in both groups.

conclusionSmokers benefit from either anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or the combined regimen compared with chemotherapy. Considering cost-effectiveness, monotherapy was recommended to smokers. For non-smokers, only the combined regimen was feasible in non-small cell lung cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCarcinomaHumansImmunotherapyNon-SmokersPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokersAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnti-PD-1/PD-L1Immune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyMeta-analysisSmoking

Identifiers

PMID31959178
PMCPMC6971889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.