Trial reportRespiratory research2020
"Can do, don't do" are not the lazy ones: a longitudinal study on physical functioning in patients with COPD.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01527773 (The Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outcomes Cohort of Switzerland), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outcomes Cohort of Switzerland (TOP DOCS): Phenotypes and Vascular Damage in COPD
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise capacity and physical activity in COPD patients treated with a LAMA/LABA combination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2022Pooled it
- Physical capacity and inactivity in obstructive airway diseases: a "can do, do do" analysis.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- "Can Do" vs. "Do Do" in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sensor-Derived Physical Activity Patterns.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multimorbidity groups based on numbers of chronic conditions are associated with daily activity.Chronic illness · 2022Article
- Impact of extrapulmonary comorbidities on physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japan: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2022Article
- The "can do, do do" concept in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an exploration of psychological mechanisms.Respiratory research · 2021Article
- Telemonitoring of daily activities compared to the six-minute walk test further completes the puzzle of oximetry-guided interventions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Exacerbations and Changes in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Patients with Bronchiectasis after 1 Year.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Respond to the letter to the editor by Van't Hul et al. regarding the published manuscript "can do, don't do" are not the lazy ones: a longitudinal study on physical functioning in patients with COPD" by Sievi et al.(1).Respiratory research · 2020Article
- The 'can do, do do' concept in COPD; quadrant interpretation, affiliation and tracking longitudinal changes.Respiratory research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveReduced physical capacity (PC) and physical activity (PA) are common in COPD patients and associated with poor outcome. However, they represent different aspects of physical functioning and interventions do not affect them in the same manner. To address this, a new PC-PA quadrant concept was recently generated to identify clinical characteristics of sub-groups of physical functioning. The objective of this study was to I) proof the new concept and to verify their differentiating clinical characteristics, II) evaluate the consistency of the concept over time, III) assess whether patients changed their quadrant affiliation over time, IV) and to test if changes in quadrant affiliations are associated with changes in clinical characteristics.
methodsIn a longitudinal, prospective, non-interventional cohort with mild to very severe COPD patients, PC and PA as well as respiratory variables, COPD-specific health status, comorbidities, survival, and exacerbations were yearly assessed.
resultsData from 283 patients were analysed at baseline. Mean (min/max) follow-up time was 2.4 (0.5/6.8) years. The PC-PA quadrants could be characterized as follows: I) "can't do, don't do": most severe and symptomatic, several comorbidities II) "can do, don't do": severe but less symptomatic, several comorbidities III) "can't do, do do": few patients, severe and symptomatic, less comorbidities IV) "can do, do do": mildest and less symptomatic, less comorbidities, lowest exacerbation frequency. Of the 172 patients with at least one follow-up, 58% patients never changed their quadrant affiliation, while 17% declined either PC, PA or both, 11% improved their PC, PA or both, and 14% showed improvement and decline in PC, PA or both during study period. None of the clinical characteristics or their annual changes showed consistent significant and relevant differences between all individual sub-groups.
conclusionOur findings suggest that there are no clinical characteristics allowing to distinguish between the PC-PA quadrants and the concept seems not able to illustrate disease process. However, the already low PA but preserved PC in the "can do, don't do" quadrant raises the question if regularly assessment of PA in clinical practice would be more sensitive to detect progressive deterioration of COPD compared to the commonly used PC. CLINICAL
trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01527773.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.