Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959164›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records.

Carmen Sayon-Orea, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Josu Delfrade, Manuela Sanchez-Echenique, Pilar Amiano, Eva Ardanaz, Javier Gorricho, Garbiñe Basterra, Marian Nuin, Marcela Guevara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Concordance between FVC and FEVBMJ open respiratory research · 2025
    Article
  7. Variation in PSA Levels by Age, Adiposity, Race and Ethnicity, and Genetic Risk: Implications for Prostate Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Data Resource Profile: Results Analysis Base of Navarre (BARDENA).International journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmen Sayon-OreaServicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
Conchi Moreno-IribasPublic Health Institute of Navarra, IdiSNA, Leyre 15, 31003, Pamplona, Spain. mmorenoi@cfnavarra.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6537-0131
Josu DelfradePublic Health Institute of Navarra, IdiSNA, Leyre 15, 31003, Pamplona, Spain.
Manuela Sanchez-EcheniquePrimary Healthcare, Navarra Health Service, Pamplona, Spain.
Pilar AmianoBiomedical Research Center Network for Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Eva ArdanazPublic Health Institute of Navarra, IdiSNA, Leyre 15, 31003, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier GorrichoResearch Network for Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain.
Garbiñe BasterraDepartment of Health, Navarra Regional Government, Pamplona, Spain.
Marian NuinPrimary Healthcare, Navarra Health Service, Pamplona, Spain.
Marcela GuevaraPublic Health Institute of Navarra, IdiSNA, Leyre 15, 31003, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHeight and weight data from electronic health records are increasingly being used to estimate the prevalence of childhood obesity. Here, we aim to assess the selection bias due to missing weight and height data from electronic health records in children older than five.

methodsCohort study of 10,811 children born in Navarra (Spain) between 2002 and 2003, who were still living in this region by December 2016. We examined the differences between measured and non-measured children older than 5 years considering weight-associated variables (sex, rural or urban residence, family income and weight status at 2-5 yrs). These variables were used to calculate stabilized weights for inverse-probability weighting and to conduct multiple imputation for the missing data. We calculated complete data prevalence and adjusted prevalence considering the missing data using inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for ages 6 to 14 and group ages 6 to 9 and 10 to 14.

resultsFor 6-9 years, complete data, inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation obesity age-adjusted prevalence were 13.18% (95% CI: 12.54-13.85), 13.22% (95% CI: 12.57-13.89) and 13.02% (95% CI: 12.38-13.66) and for 10-14 years 8.61% (95% CI: 8.06-9.18), 8.62% (95% CI: 8.06-9.20) and 8.24% (95% CI: 7.70-8.78), respectively.

conclusionsAges at which well-child visits are scheduled and for the 6 to 9 and 10 to 14 age groups, weight status estimations are similar using complete data, multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting. Readily available electronic health record data may be a tool to monitor the weight status in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentBody Weights and MeasuresChildCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrevalenceProbabilitySelection BiasSpainChildhood obesityElectronic health recordsInverse-probability weightingMultiple imputationPrevalenceWeight status

Identifiers

PMID31959164
PMCPMC6971988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.