Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31958064›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2020

Effectiveness of a Digital Lifestyle Change Program in Obese and Type 2 Diabetes Populations: Service Evaluation of Real-World Data.

Iskandar Idris, James Hampton, Fiona Moncrieff, Michael Whitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Patient participation in the development and application of eHealth].TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iskandar IdrisDivision of Medical Sciences & Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-8288
James HamptonBath and North East Somerset CCG, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-5403
Fiona MoncrieffOurPath, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-0061
Michael WhitmanOurPath, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7144-7545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity is increasing, and the way people interact with health care is evolving. People traditionally access advice and support to improve their lifestyle and learn more about the self-management of T2DM in a face-to-face setting. Although these services have a strong evidence base, they have limitations for reaching specific groups of people. Digital programs could provide a new delivery model to help more people access health education and behavior change support, but long-term data supporting these programs are limited.

objectiveThe purpose of this service evaluation was to analyze the weight change of people who participated in OurPath (also known as Second Nature), a UK-based digital lifestyle change program, for either weight management or diabetes-related weight management and structured education at 6 and 12 months.

methodsParticipants either paid to access the program privately (self-funded clients) or were referred by their general practitioner to participate in the program free of charge (funded by the National Health Service). Additional follow-up support was provided to help people to maintain lifestyle changes. To retrospectively assess potential weight loss, the analysis included data from participants who submitted weight readings at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting the program. Changes in weight after 6 and 12 months were primary outcome measures.

resultsFor the 896 participants who submitted baseline and 6- and 12-month data, a significant change in mean weight of -7.12 kg (-7.50%; SD 6.37; P<.001) was observed at 6 months. Data from the same participants at 12 months showed a change in mean weight when compared with a baseline of -6.14 kg (-6.48%; SD 6.97; P<.001).

conclusionsThe data presented here had several limitations, and there were too many uncertainties to make any reliable conclusions. However, these results suggest that digital lifestyle change programs could provide a new way to help people to access nutritional advice and support to achieve weight loss. Further research into digital education and coaching platforms is needed to establish their effectiveness.

Indexed as

behavior changecognitive behavioral therapydieteticsdigitalempowermentmHealthmobile appobesityOurPathpreventiontype 2 diabetesweight losswell-being

Identifiers

PMID31958064
PMCPMC6997924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.