Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957955›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2020

Efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease: An individual patient-level pooled data analysis.

Mahesh V Madhavan, Bahira Shahim, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Lawrence Garcia, Aaron Crowley, Sahil A Parikh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05973994 (Shockwave Induced Attenuation of Calcified Plaques Quantified With OCT), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05973994 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Shockwave Induced Attenuation of Calcified Plaques Quantified With OCT

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsCoronary Artery CalcificationArmsintravascular lithotripsy with Shockwave coronary system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Peripheral Artery Calcification: 30-Day Outcomes From the Disrupt PAD III Observational Study.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2026
    Observational
  4. Peripheral Vascular Calcification.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Peripheral artery disease II: femoropopliteal lesions].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Intravascular Lithotripsy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease: An individual patient-level pooled data analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mahesh V MadhavanDivision of Cardiology and Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Bahira ShahimClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Carlos Mena-HurtadoSection of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lawrence GarciaSection of Interventional and Peripheral Vascular Interventions, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron CrowleyClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Sahil A ParikhDivision of Cardiology and Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7740-1481
Cardiovascular Research Foundation · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USTufts University · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the most common manifestations of atherosclerotic disease worldwide. Peripheral arterial calcification reduces acute success and long-term patency of endovascular therapy for PAD. Several calcium modification devices are available for use in peripheral interventions. Outcomes after peripheral intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a novel approach using pulsatile sonic waves to treat luminal and medial calcium in patients with PAD, have not been extensively characterized. Therefore, we sought to perform an individual patient-level data (IPD) pooled analysis of available studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVL in the treatment of PAD. METHODS AND

resultsWe pooled IPD, including baseline and procedural variables, from five prospective studies which assessed IVL in the treatment of patients with extensive peripheral artery calcification. Final postprocedural percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and procedural angiographic complications were assessed by independent core laboratory. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using linear mixed effects models and safety endpoints were tabulated overall and by vascular bed. Among 336 patients who underwent endovascular revascularization with use of IVL, there was a significant reduction between pre-procedural and final %DS of 55.1% (95% confidence interval 53.3-57.0%, p < .0001). Core-laboratory assessed lesion-level complications, including flow-limiting dissections (Types D-F), vessel perforation, distal embolization, thrombus, abrupt closure, and no reflow, occurred in 4/328 (1.22%) of treated lesions.

conclusionsThe present IPD of five prospective studies, marking the largest analysis to date evaluating the use of IVL in significantly calcified PAD lesions, demonstrates this treatment strategy to be both effective and safe.

Indexed as

LithotripsyAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular Calcificationendovascular interventionperipheral arterial diseaseperipheral interventionvascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID31957955
PMCPMC7187419
OpenAlexW3002111428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.