Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957781›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2020

The future incidence, prevalence and costs of stroke in the UK.

Derek King, Raphael Wittenberg, Anita Patel, Zahid Quayyum, Vladislav Berdunov, Martin Knapp

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05981729 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of Inpatient Technology Enriched Stroke Rehabilitation During the Acute and Sub-acute Phase After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of StrathclydeRan2023 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsStrokeArmsTechnology enriched stroke rehabilitation
NCT07267468 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of an mHealth Intervention, Based on Rehabilitation and a Personalised Nutrition Plan, in the Recovery and Improvement of Dysphagia in Patients Diagnosed With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CadizRan2026 to 2026Enrolled74ConditionsStroke, Deglutition DisordersArmsmHealth intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Intensive, Multi-Technology Rehabilitation Programme for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Outcomes of a Phase I Single-Arm Repeated-Measures Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Benefits and Importance of Early Rehabilitation in Patients After Stroke.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy-a hematologic perspective.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  13. Frailty and Cardiovascular Risk.European cardiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derek KingCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK.
Raphael WittenbergCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK.
Anita PatelAnita Patel Health Economics Consulting Ltd., London, UK.
Zahid QuayyumJames P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Vladislav BerdunovAmaris, London, UK.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundwe project incidence and prevalence of stroke in the UK and associated costs to society to 2035. We include future costs of health care, social care, unpaid care and lost productivity, drawing on recent estimates that there are almost 1 million people living with stroke and the current cost of their care is £26 billion.

methodswe developed a model to produce projections, building on earlier work to estimate the costs of stroke care by age, gender and other characteristics. Our cell-based simulation model uses the 2014-based Office for National Statistics population projections; future trends in incidence and prevalence rates of stroke derived from an expert consultation exercise; and data from the Office for Budget Responsibility on expected future changes in productivity and average earnings.

resultsbetween 2015 and 2035, the number of strokes in the UK per year is projected to increase by 60% and the number of stroke survivors is projected to more than double. Under current patterns of care, the societal cost is projected to almost treble in constant prices over the period. The greatest increase is projected to be in social care costs-both public and private-which we anticipate will rise by as much as 250% between 2015 and 2035.

conclusionthe costs of stroke care in the UK are expected to rise rapidly over the next two decades unless measures to prevent strokes and to reduce the disabling effects of strokes can be successfully developed and implemented.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleForecastingHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPrevalenceSex FactorsSocial Welfarecostsincidenceolder peopleprevalenceprojectionsstroke

Identifiers

PMID31957781
PMCPMC7047821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.