ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Validation of Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy - Artificial intelligence versus clinician for screening.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance and limitation of machine learning algorithms for diabetic retinopathy screening and its application in health management: a meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Pooled it
- Performance and Limitation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Real-World Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in retinal care: transforming the doctor-patient partnership.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Reach and implementation of human and AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening models in primary healthcare settings in India.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Assessing adoption of human and AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening in primary healthcare settings: findings from a pragmatic trial.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Practical Applications, Subspecialty Evidence and Real-World Deployment.Cureus · 2025Review
- A deep learning framework for gender sensitive speech emotion recognition based on MFCC feature selection and SHAP analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Smartphone-Based Fundus Photography and Deep-Learning Artificial Intelligence in the Yucatan Peninsula: A Field Study.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Validation of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for the Quantification of Major OCT Parameters in Diabetic Macular Edema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Performance analysis of pretrained convolutional neural network models for ophthalmological disease classification.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Article
- A hybrid neural network approach for classifying diabetic retinopathy subtypes.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A multidisciplinary approach.Integrative medicine research · 2022Article
- Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy using Convolutional Neural Networks for Feature Extraction and Classification (DRFEC).Multimedia tools and applications · 2022Article
- Everything real about unreal artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy and in ocular pathologies.World journal of diabetes · 2022Review
- A computer-aided diagnosis system for detecting various diabetic retinopathy grades based on a hybrid deep learning technique.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Acceptability of artificial intelligence-based retina screening in general population.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Pre-Diagnosis Assessment Module for Retinal Photographs: A Multicenter Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Deep learning is a newer and advanced subfield in artificial intelligence (AI). The aim of our study is to validate a machine-based algorithm developed based on deep convolutional neural networks as a tool for screening to detect referable diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: An AI algorithm to detect DR was validated at our hospital using an internal dataset consisting of 1,533 macula-centered fundus images collected retrospectively and an external validation set using Methods to Evaluate Segmentation and Indexing Techniques in the field of Retinal Ophthalmology (MESSIDOR) dataset. Images were graded by two retina specialists as any DR, prompt referral (moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or above or presence of macular edema) and sight-threatening DR/STDR (severe NPDR or above) and compared with AI results. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) for both internal and external validation sets for any DR detection, prompt referral, and STDR were calculated. Interobserver agreement using kappa value was calculated for both the sets and two out of three agreements for DR grading was considered as ground truth to compare with AI results. Results: In the internal validation set, the overall sensitivity and specificity was 99.7% and 98.5% for Any DR detection and 98.9% and 94.84%for Prompt referral respectively. The AUC was 0.991 and 0.969 for any DR detection and prompt referral respectively. The agreement between two observers was 99.5% and 99.2% for any DR detection and prompt referral with a kappa value of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. In the external validation set (MESSIDOR 1), the overall sensitivity and specificity was 90.4% and 91.0% for any DR detection and 94.7% and 97.4% for prompt referral, respectively. The AUC was. 907 and. 960 for any DR detection and prompt referral, respectively. The agreement between two observers was 98.5% and 97.8% for any DR detection and prompt referral with a kappa value of 0.971 and 0.980, respectively. Conclusion: With increasing diabetic population and growing demand supply gap in trained resources, AI is the future for early identification of DR and reducing blindness. This can revolutionize telescreening in ophthalmology, especially where people do not have access to specialized health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.