Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957735›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2020

Medios- An offline, smartphone-based artificial intelligence algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Bhavana Sosale, Aravind R Sosale, Hemanth Murthy, Sabyasachi Sengupta, Muralidhar Naveenam

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. AI-Based Metamaterial Design.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhavana SosaleDepartment of Diabetology, Diacon Hospital, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Aravind R SosaleDepartment of Diabetology, Diacon Hospital, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Hemanth MurthyDepartment of Vitreo-Retinal Surgery, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sabyasachi SenguptaDepartment of Vitreo-Retinal Surgery, Future Vision Eye Care, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Muralidhar NaveenamDepartment of Vitreo-Retinal Surgery, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Diacon Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: An observational study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Medios smartphone-based offline deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with the image diagnosis of ophthalmologists. Methods: Patients attending the outpatient services of a tertiary center for diabetes care underwent 3-field dilated retinal imaging using the Remidio NM FOP 10. Two fellowship-trained vitreoretinal specialists separately graded anonymized images and a patient-level diagnosis was reached based on grading of the worse eye. The images were subjected to offline grading using the Medios integrated AI-based software on the same smartphone used to acquire images. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI in detecting referable DR (moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR) or worse disease) was compared to the gold standard diagnosis of the retina specialists. Results: Results include analysis of images from 297 patients of which 176 (59.2%) had no DR, 35 (11.7%) had mild NPDR, 41 (13.8%) had moderate NPDR, and 33 (11.1%) had severe NPDR. In addition, 12 (4%) patients had PDR and 36 (20.4%) had macular edema. Sensitivity and specificity of the AI in detecting referable DR was 98.84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.62-100%) and 86.73% (95% CI, 82.87-90.59%), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.92. The sensitivity for vision-threatening DR (VTDR) was 100%. Conclusion: The AI-based software had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting referable DR. Integration with the smartphone-based fundus camera with offline image grading has the potential for widespread applications in resource-poor settings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceSmartphoneSoftwareCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligencedeep learningdiabetic retinopathy

Identifiers

PMID31957735
PMCPMC7003589
OpenAlexW3002048497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.