Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957732›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020

Prevalence and causes of avoidable blindness and visual impairment, including the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Siwan district of Bihar, India: A population-based survey.

Ajit Kumar Poddar, Tanwir Ahmed Khan, Kumari Sweta, Mritunjay Kumar Tiwary, Rishi R Borah, Rahul Ali, Asim Kumar Sil, Sethu Sheeladevi

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ajit Kumar PoddarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospitals, Bihar, India.
Tanwir Ahmed KhanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospitals, Bihar, India.
Kumari SwetaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospitals, Bihar, India.
Mritunjay Kumar TiwaryDepartment of Ophthalmology, Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospitals, Bihar, India.
Rishi R BorahOrbis India Country Office, Vivekanand Mission Ashram, Netra Niramaya Niketan, Haldia, West Bengal, India.
Rahul AliOrbis India Country Office, Vivekanand Mission Ashram, Netra Niramaya Niketan, Haldia, West Bengal, India.
Asim Kumar SilDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vivekanand Mission Ashram, Netra Niramaya Niketan, Haldia, West Bengal, India.
Sethu SheeladeviOrbis India Country Office, Vivekanand Mission Ashram, Netra Niramaya Niketan, Haldia, West Bengal, India.
Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira · INAditya Jyot Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and causes of visual impairment (VI) and blindness and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Siwan district, Bihar. Methods: A population-based cross-sectional study was done from January to March 2016 using the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness 6 (RAAB 6, incorporating DR module) methodology. All individuals aged ≥50 years were examined in 57 randomly selected clusters within the district. Results: A total of 3476 individuals were enumerated and 3189 (92%) completed examination. The overall prevalence of blindness and severe VI was 2.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-2.8) and 3.4% (95% CI: 2.6-4.3), respectively. Untreated cataract was the leading cause of blindness (73%) and severe VI (93%). The cataract surgical coverage (CSC) at <3/60 was 71.5% for eyes and 89.3% for persons in this sample and the CSC was similar between the genders. Refractive error (71%) was the primary cause of early VI. The overall prevalence of known and newly diagnosed diabetes was 6.3% (95% CI, 5.4-7.2%). Prevalence of any DR, maculopathy, and sight-threatening DR was 15, 12.4, and 6%, respectively. Conclusion: To conclude, as compared to previous reports, the prevalence of blindness and DR in Siwan district of Bihar was found to be lower and the CSC was higher. However, the problem of avoidable blindness remains a major problem in this region.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overBlindnessCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAvoidable blindnesscataract surgical coveragediabetic retinopathyRAAB 6visual impairment

Identifiers

PMID31957732
PMCPMC7003600
OpenAlexW3001704986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.