ArticleEpidemiology and infection2020
Cross-sectional serosurvey of
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global and regional seroprevalence of coxiellosis in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024Pooled it
- Nationwide Q Fever Hospitalizations in Italy, 2014-2023: Evidence of Underrecognition and a Sardinian Hotspot.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Q fever in Kazakhstan: seroepidemiology, molecular evidence, and spatial distribution across livestock and ticks.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Surveillance of Q Fever in Dairy Cattle in Latvia: Molecular and Serological Findings and Association with Farm and Woodland Density.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Combination of serology and PCR analysis of environmental samples to assessApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Sero-epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii in livestock and humans in Isiolo county Kenya.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Q Fever: Who Is at Risk? A Serological Survey in the General Population and Occupationally Exposed Individuals in Northern Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence of bovine Herpesvirus-1, bovine viral diarrhoea virus, Neospora caninum and Coxiella burnetii in dairy cows in Ethiopia.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Spatial distribution of Q fever in sheep and goats of selective villages of Punjab Province, Pakistan.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Herd-level seroprevalence, molecular prevalence, and trends ofVeterinary world · 2024Article
- Molecular and Serological Findings in Sheep During TwoAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A sero-epidemiological analysis of Coxiella burnetii infection and its risk factors in livestock from Addis Ababa, Adama, and Modjo abattoirs and pastoral areas of Oromia, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Seroprevalance of Brucellosis and Q-fever in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in Haryana state, India.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A One Health Evaluation of the Surveillance Systems on Tick-Borne Diseases in the Netherlands, Spain and Italy.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Serological Evidence of Q Fever among Dairy Cattle and Buffalo Populations in the Campania Region, Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sero-epidemiological survey of Coxiella burnetii in livestock and humans in Tana River and Garissa counties in Kenya.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- A Freedom ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cross-sectional survey was carried out to estimate the seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in extensively grazed cattle and sheep from central Italy and to identify the related risk factors. Data on notified human Q fever cases in the area were also collected and described. A two-stage cluster sampling was performed. A total of 5083 animals (2210 cattle; 2873 sheep) belonging to 186 farms (92 herds; 94 flocks) were tested for the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The prevalence at the animal-level resulted three times higher in sheep compared to cattle (37.8% vs. 12.0%; χ2 = 270.10, P < 0.001). The prevalence at the herd-level was also higher in sheep than in cattle (87.2% vs. 68.5%; χ2 = 9.52, P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of seropositivity for cattle aged 67-107 months (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.86-4.18), cattle >107 months of age (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.36-3.14) and mixed breed cattle (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11-2.72). A herd size >92 animals was recognized as herd-level risk factor in cattle (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.67-28.37). The risk of being seropositive was double in sheep belonging to flocks >600 animals (odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% CI 1.63-2.56). Sheep were confirmed to be the most exposed species. Nevertheless, the prevalence observed in cattle also suggests the potential involvement of this species in the circulation of the pathogen in the area. Seven confirmed human Q fever cases were reported. In five out of seven cases there was at least one exposed herd within a 5 km buffer. Even though the source of the infection was not identified, the possibility of C. burnetii circulating in the livestock and human population in the study area cannot be overlooked. The integration between veterinary and human surveillance will be crucial to understand the spread of this zoonosis and to support the adoption of appropriate control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.