Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957623›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2021

Comparison between self-administered depression questionnaires and patients' own views of changes in their mood: a prospective cohort study in primary care.

Catherine Hobbs, Gemma Lewis, Christopher Dowrick, Daphne Kounali, Tim J Peters, Glyn Lewis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine HobbsDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, BathBA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-5882
Gemma LewisDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6666-3681
Christopher DowrickInstitute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building Block B, LiverpoolL69 3BX, UK.
Daphne KounaliBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, BristolBS8 2BN, UK.
Tim J PetersBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, First Floor, Learning and Research, Southmead Hospital, BristolBS10 5NB, UK.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-administered questionnaires are widely used in primary care and other clinical settings to assess the severity of depressive symptoms and monitor treatment outcomes. Qualitative studies have found that changes in questionnaire scores might not fully capture patients' experience of changes in their mood but there are no quantitative studies of this issue. We examined the extent to which changes in scores from depression questionnaires disagreed with primary care patients' perceptions of changes in their mood and investigated factors influencing this relationship.

methodsProspective cohort study assessing patients on four occasions, 2 weeks apart. Patients (N = 554) were recruited from primary care surgeries in three UK sites (Bristol, Liverpool and York) and had reported depressive symptoms or low mood in the past year [68% female, mean age 48.3 (s.d. 12.6)]. Main outcome measures were changes in scores on patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and beck depression inventory (BDI-II) and the patients' own ratings of change.

resultsThere was marked disagreement between clinically important changes in questionnaire scores and patient-rated change, with disagreement of 51% (95% CI 46-55%) on PHQ-9 and 55% (95% CI 51-60%) on BDI-II. Patients with more severe anxiety were less likely, and those with better mental and physical health-related quality of life were more likely, to report feeling better, having controlled for depression scores.

conclusionsOur results illustrate the limitations of self-reported depression scales to assess clinical change. Clinicians should be cautious in interpreting changes in questionnaire scores without further clinical assessment.

Indexed as

AffectAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesDepressionepidemiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31957623
PMCPMC8108392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.