Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957229›Full record

ReviewGenes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms2020

Tree of motility - A proposed history of motility systems in the tree of life.

Makoto Miyata, Robert C Robinson, Taro Q P Uyeda, Yoshihiro Fukumori, Shun-Ichi Fukushima, Shin Haruta, Michio Homma, Kazuo Inaba, Masahiro Ito, Chikara Kaito and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Flagellar location determines the stability of bacterial surface entrapment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Functional morphology of gliding motility in benthic diatoms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dimeric assembly of FScience advances · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Synchronization of E. coli Bacteria Moving in Coupled Microwells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.

Makoto MiyataDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7478-7390
Robert C RobinsonResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-6903
Taro Q P UyedaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-9499
Yoshihiro FukumoriFaculty of Natural System, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Shun-Ichi FukushimaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shin HarutaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Michio HommaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-001X
Kazuo InabaShimoda Marine Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masahiro ItoGraduate School of Life Sciences, Toyo University, Gunma, Japan.
Chikara KaitoLaboratory of Microbiology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro KatoLaboratory of Sustainable Animal Environment, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KenriLaboratory of Mycoplasmas and Haemophilus, Department of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki KinositaDepartment of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-2800
Seiji KojimaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Tohru MinaminoGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MoriInstitute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuichi NakamuraDepartment of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Daisuke NakaneDepartment of Physics, Gakushuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji NakayamaDepartment of Microbiology and Oral Infection, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masayoshi NishiyamaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-3766
Satoshi ShibataMolecular Cryo-Electron Microscopy Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.
Katsuya ShimabukuroDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Ube College, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Masatada TamakoshiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Azuma TaokaFaculty of Natural System, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yosuke TashiroDepartment of Engineering, Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan.
Isil TulumDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hirofumi WadaDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.
Ken-Ichi WakabayashiLaboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kanazawa University · JPNagoya University · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JPGakushuin University · JPIstanbul University · TRKindai University · JPKyoto University · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPNational Institute of Technology, Ube College · JPOkayama University of Science · JPOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPOsaka City University · JPRitsumeikan University · JPShizuoka University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JPTokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JPToyo University · JPUbe Frontier University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17H06082Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24117001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motility often plays a decisive role in the survival of species. Five systems of motility have been studied in depth: those propelled by bacterial flagella, eukaryotic actin polymerization and the eukaryotic motor proteins myosin, kinesin and dynein. However, many organisms exhibit surprisingly diverse motilities, and advances in genomics, molecular biology and imaging have showed that those motilities have inherently independent mechanisms. This makes defining the breadth of motility nontrivial, because novel motilities may be driven by unknown mechanisms. Here, we classify the known motilities based on the unique classes of movement-producing protein architectures. Based on this criterion, the current total of independent motility systems stands at 18 types. In this perspective, we discuss these modes of motility relative to the latest phylogenetic Tree of Life and propose a history of motility. During the ~4 billion years since the emergence of life, motility arose in Bacteria with flagella and pili, and in Archaea with archaella. Newer modes of motility became possible in Eukarya with changes to the cell envelope. Presence or absence of a peptidoglycan layer, the acquisition of robust membrane dynamics, the enlargement of cells and environmental opportunities likely provided the context for the (co)evolution of novel types of motility.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsBacteriaBiological EvolutionCell MovementDyneinsEvolution, MolecularFlagellaHumansKinesinsMyosinsPhylogenyDyneinsKinesinsMyosinsappendagecytoskeletonflagellamembrane remodelingMollicutesmotor proteinpeptidoglycanthree domains

Identifiers

PMID31957229
PMCPMC7004002
OpenAlexW3001394168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.