Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31957022›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Impact of gentrification on adult mental health.

Linda Diem Tran, Thomas H Rice, Paul M Ong, Sudipto Banerjee, Julia Liou, Ninez A Ponce

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Journal of community practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Diem TranDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-2878
Thomas H RiceDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Paul M OngDepartment of Urban Planning, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Sudipto BanerjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Julia LiouAsian Health Services, Oakland, California.
Ninez A PonceDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · USAsian Health Services · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000121 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000121NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the net effect of living in a gentrified neighborhood on probability of having serious psychological distress. DATA SOURCES: We pooled 5 years of secondary data from the California Health Interview Survey (2011-2015) and focused on southern California residents. STUDY

designWe compared adults (n = 43 815) living in low-income and gentrified, low-income and not gentrified, middle- to high-income and upscaled, and middle- to high-income and not upscaled neighborhoods. We performed a probit regression to test whether living in a gentrified neighborhood increased residents' probabilities of having serious psychological distress in the past year and stratified analyses by neighborhood tenure, homeownership status, and low-income status. Instrumental variables estimation and propensity scores were applied to reduce bias arising from residential selection and simultaneity. An endogenous treatment effects model was also applied in sensitivity analyses. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsAdults who completed the survey on their own and lived in urban neighborhoods with 500 or more residents were selected for analyses. Survey respondents who scored 13 and above on the Kessler 6 were categorized as having serious psychological distress in the past year. We used eight neighborhood change measures to classify respondents' neighborhoods. PRINCIPAL

findingsLiving in a gentrified and upscaled neighborhood was associated with increased likelihood of serious psychological distress relative to living in a low-income and not gentrified neighborhood. The average treatment effect was 0.0141 (standard error = 0.007), which indicates that the prevalence of serious psychological distress would have been 1.4 percentage points less if none of the respondents lived in gentrified neighborhoods. Gentrification appears to have a negative impact on the mental health of renters, low-income residents, and long-term residents. This effect was not observed among homeowners, higher-income residents, and recent residents.

conclusionsGentrification levies mental health costs on financially vulnerable community members and can worsen mental health inequities.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPovertyResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsStress, PsychologicalUrban RenewalYoung Adultgentrificationmental healthpsychologicalresidence characteristicssocial determinants of healthstress

Identifiers

PMID31957022
PMCPMC7240775
OpenAlexW2982157695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.