Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31956940›Full record

SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Immunotherapy-based combinations versus standard first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sebastiano Buti, Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Ghidini, Ivano Vavassori, Umberto Maestroni, Melissa Bersanelli

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunotherapy‑based combinations versus standard first‑line and hypothyroidism risk.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Fausto PetrelliMedical Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, BG, Italy. faupe@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-4486
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
Ivano VavassoriUrology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Umberto MaestroniUrology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Melissa BersanelliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITCasa di Cura Columbus · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConsidering the recent publication of the results of several clinical trials for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing standard first-line VEGFR-targeted therapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations for mRCC patients.

methods3960 patients from 5 randomized clinical trials where available for evaluation.

resultIn the all-comers population, immunotherapy-based combinations were able to decrease the risk of death over the standard of care by 26% (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.92; p = 0.006), to decrease the risk of progression by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.86; p < 0.00001), and to increase the relative risk of response by 40% (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.11-1.77; p = 0.006). For poor/intermediate-risk patients, the risk of death is decreased by 41% and the risk of progression by 27%.

conclusionsThe benefit of immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC patients is independent from the IMDC risk group, but it is stronger for poor/intermediate-risk patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellHumansImmunotherapyKidney NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnti-PD-1Anti-PD-L1First-line treatmentImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMeta-analysisRenal cell carcinomaSunitinibTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31956940
OpenAlexW3000015829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.