ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2020
New method for acquiring the expected extension gap in total knee arthroplasty.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdjusting the soft-tissue balance during surgery is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, even using the gap technique, the expected tibial gap is sometimes not achievable. We developed a new method of proximal tibial cutting to acquire the expected tibial gap and insert a tibial liner of appropriate thickness.
methodsThis study included 128 patients who underwent medial pivot-type TKA for varus knee osteoarthrosis. After completion of the femoral cut using and removal of the bony spur at the medial tibia according to the preoperative plan, we inserted a trial femoral component to the distal femur. Applying valgus manual stress on the knee in extension, we measured the medial gap between the femoral trial and tibial plateau using calipers, defining this medial gap as "pre-gap". A proximal tibial cut was made referring to the pre-gap in the pre-gap group (n = 64). We defined Δgap as the difference between the expected tibial liner thickness and the final tibial liner thickness during surgery. We compared Δgap between the pre-gap group and a control group with conventional tibial cutting without pre-gap measurement (n = 64).
resultsThe frequency of an ideal tibial cut (Δgap = 0) was 82% in the pre-gap group and 61% in the control group. The frequency of outliers (Δgap ≥ 2 mm) was 4% and 18%, respectively. The expected tibial liner was selected more frequently in the pre-gap group than in the control group.
conclusionsOur method was beneficial for acquiring the expected gap in extension to avoid an inadequate gap. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Case-control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.