ReviewBioactive materials2020
3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
205 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolution in optical molecular imaging techniques guided nerve imaging from 2009 to 2023: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Research hotspots and emerging trends of 3D printing in bone defects: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science core collection from 2006 to March 2026.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- L-leucine-incorporated 3D-printed SilMA hydrogel scaffolds promote calvarial defect repair with PLOD2-associated collagen remodeling.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Multifunctional Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds: Integrating Conductive Nanomaterials for Smart Wound Healing Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multidimensional bibliometric analysis and global trends in the nervous system's role in bone regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Enhancing the osteogenic potential of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds via in-situ ZIF-8 surface modification.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Granulate-to-Filament: An Extrusion-Mixed PLA-Human Bone Material System for 3D-Printed Bone Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Engineering ovarian tissue via biofabrication and 3D bioprinting: Challenges and emerging perspectives.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Biodegradable and osteoconductive sodium alginate-gelatin/amorphous magnesium phosphate 3D-printed scaffolds for craniofacial bone regeneration.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Integrated 3D printing of topologically hierarchical mechanical hydrogel for accelerating osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Article
- PEDOTs in Bone Tissue Engineering Composites: Fabrication Strategies and Translational Hurdles.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Calcium Phosphate-Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Novel multi-component synergistic bioink that balances biocompatibility and mechanical strength for cartilage regeneration.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Article
- Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Residues as Sustainable Sources of Next-Generation Biomedical Materials: Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing 3D scaffold models for metastatic prostate cancer in bone: Materials, manufacture, and future perspectives.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering is promising in realizing successful treatments of human body tissue loss that current methods cannot treat well or achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes. In scaffold-based bone tissue engineering, a high performance scaffold underpins the success of a bone tissue engineering strategy and a major direction in the field is to produce bone tissue engineering scaffolds with desirable shape, structural, physical, chemical and biological features for enhanced biological performance and for regenerating complex bone tissues. Three-dimensional (3D) printing can produce customized scaffolds that are highly desirable for bone tissue engineering. The enormous interest in 3D printing and 3D printed objects by the science, engineering and medical communities has led to various developments of the 3D printing technology and wide investigations of 3D printed products in many industries, including biomedical engineering, over the past decade. It is now possible to create novel bone tissue engineering scaffolds with customized shape, architecture, favorable macro-micro structure, wettability, mechanical strength and cellular responses. This article provides a concise review of recent advances in the R & D of 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. It also presents our philosophy and research in the designing and fabrication of bone tissue engineering scaffolds through 3D printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.