Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31956726›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Non-inferiority trial comparing cigarette consumption, adoption rates, acceptability, tolerability, and tobacco harm reduction potential in smokers switching to Heated Tobacco Products or electronic cigarettes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Pasquale Caponnetto, Massimo Caruso, Marilena Maglia, Rosalia Emma, Daniela Saitta, Barbara Busà, Riccardo Polosa, Umberto Prosperini, Alfio Pennisi, Francesca Benfatto and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03569748 (Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial ComparingCigarette Consumption, Adoption Rates, Acceptability, Tolerability, and Tobacco Harm Reduction Potential in Smokers Switching to Heated Tobacco Products or Electronic Cigarettes), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03569748 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial ComparingCigarette Consumption, Adoption Rates, Acceptability, Tolerability, and Tobacco Harm Reduction Potential in Smokers Switching to Heated Tobacco Products or Electronic Cigarettes: Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CataniaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled220ConditionsSmoking, CigaretteArmsIQOS, E-CIG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale CaponnettoCentro per La Prevenzione e Cura Del Tabagismo (CPCT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-V. Emanuele", Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Massimo CarusoDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Marilena MagliaCentro per La Prevenzione e Cura Del Tabagismo (CPCT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-V. Emanuele", Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rosalia EmmaDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Daniela SaittaDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Barbara BusàUOC Farmacia Ospedaliera, ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania, Italy.
Riccardo PolosaDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Umberto ProsperiniOspedale "San Vincenzo", Taormina, Italy.
Alfio PennisiCasa di Cura Musumeci-Gecas, Gravina di Catania, Italy.
Francesca BenfattoCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR), Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Carlo SartorioCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR), Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Matteo GuastellaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR), Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Enrico MondatiCentro per La Prevenzione e Cura Del Tabagismo (CPCT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-V. Emanuele", Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITFondazione Vincenzo Pansadoro · ITOspedale Garibaldi · ITPoliclinico Universitario di Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the introduction of tobacco control measures, smoking remains highly prevalent in most EU countries. In Italy, one in four adults were still regular smokers in 2017. Increasing use of combustion-free delivering nicotine technologies for cigarette substitution may accelerate the current downward trends in smoking prevalence. Whether Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs) are more effective tobacco smoking substitutes that may potentially facilitate adoption and full conversion compared to e-cigarettes (ECs) is not known.We have designed a prospective study to compare changes in cigarette consumption and adoption rates among smokers randomized to either HTPs or ECs. Product acceptability, tolerability, and their tobacco harm reduction potential will be also compared.

methods220 healthy smokers, not motivated to quit, will be randomized into a 12-weeks single-center, open label, non-inferiority trial comparing study outcomes from HTPs vs. ECs use. The primary outcome will be biochemically verified self-reported continuous abstinence at 12-weeks from the previous visit. Secondary outcomes will include: smoking reduction from baseline, adoption rates and product acceptability, tolerability, changes in step test values and in the level of selected biomarkers of exposure in exhaled breath (i.e. eCO) and in spot urine samples. A follow-up visit will be also included at 24-weeks to review product usage and smoking behavior under naturalistic condition of use.Recruitment of participants started in May 2019 and enrolment is expected to be completed in November 2019. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study directly comparing Heated Tobacco Products with Electronic Cigarettes in term of reduction in cigarette consumption, adoption rates, product acceptability, tolerability, and tobacco harm reduction potential. This knowledge can contribute to a better understanding of the potential role of this new technology in the evolving nicotine consumer market.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03569748.Registered June 25, 2018.https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts=1&cx=-jg9qo4.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityEffectivenessElectronic cigarettesHarm reductionHeated tobacco productsIQOSJust fogNon-inferiority trialSmokingTolerability

Identifiers

PMID31956726
PMCPMC6962654
OpenAlexW2999854523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.