Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31956659›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2019

Combined Analysis of the Aberrant Epigenetic Alteration of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Rui Xu, Qiuyan Xu, Guanglei Huang, Xinhai Yin, Jianguo Zhu, Yikun Peng, Jukun Song

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The past, present, and future of immunotherapy for bladder tumors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Silencing of theFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rui Xu *Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Qiuyan Xu *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Guanglei Huang *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Xinhai YinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Jianguo ZhuDepartment of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yikun PengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-8302
Jukun SongDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2542-9340
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most fatal malignancies due to its high morbidity and mortality. DNA methylation exerts a vital part in the development of PDAC. However, a mechanistic role of mutual interactions between DNA methylation and mRNA as epigenetic regulators on transcriptomic alterations and its correlation with clinical outcomes such as survival have remained largely uncovered in cancer. Therefore, elucidation of aberrant epigenetic alteration in the development of PDAC is an urgent problem to be solved. In this work, we conduct an integrative epigenetic analysis of PDAC to identify aberrant DNA methylation-driven cancer genes during the occurrence of cancer.

methodsDNA methylation matrix and mRNA profile were obtained from the TCGA database. The integration of methylation and gene expression datasets was analyzed using an R package MethylMix. The genes with hypomethylation/hypermethylation were further validated in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The correlation analysis of gene expression and aberrant DNA methylation was also conducted. We performed a pathway analysis on aberrant DNG methylation genes identified by MethylMix criteria using ConsensusPathDB.

results188 patients with both methylation data and mRNA data were considered eligible. A mixture model was constructed, and differential methylation genes in normal and tumor groups using the Wilcoxon rank test was performed. With the inclusion criteria, 95 differential methylation genes were detected. Among these genes, 74 hypermethylation and 21 hypomethylation genes were found. The pathway analysis revealed an increase in hypermethylation of genes involved in ATP-sensitive potassium channels, Robo4, and VEGF signaling pathways crosstalk, and generic transcription pathway.

conclusionIntegrated analysis of the aberrant epigenetic alteration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma indicated that differentially methylated genes could play a vital role in the occurrence of PDAC by bioinformatics analysis. The present work can help clinicians to elaborate on the function of differentially methylated expressed genes and pathways in PDAC. CDO1, GJD2, ID4, NOL4, PAX6, TRIM58, and ZNF382 might act as aberrantly DNA-methylated biomarkers for early screening and therapy of PDAC in the future.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsReceptors, Cell SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Cell SurfaceRNA, MessengerROBO4 protein, humanRoundabout ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31956659
PMCPMC6949667
OpenAlexW2998395737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.