ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020
Rapid determination of internal strains in soft tissues using an experimentally calibrated finite element model derived from magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFinite element models (FEMs) of medical images can provide information about the underlying tissue that cannot be obtained from the original images. Preforming an accurate simulation requires the careful experimental calibration of boundary conditions. Here we describe a method for deriving a geometric mesh for soft biological materials using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, and an experimental workflow for calibrating the boundary conditions and optimizing the mesh density in these simulations.
methodsA three-dimensional image stack of a ballistic sphere gel, a bovine caudal intervertebral disc (IVD), and a human lumbar IVD were generated using a positional MRI system. These images were then segmented using a semi-automated process, converted to a tetrahedral mesh, and then modeled as a linear elastic solid. The mesh density was optimized based on simulation time and convergence with the experimental results. The modulus of the ballistic gel was determined experimentally, while the material properties for the nucleus pulposus (NP) and the annulus fibrosus (AF) within the bovine and human IVDs were assigned from literature. The simulation for the spherical gel and the bovine IVD matched the reaction forces determined experimentally in compression. We then simulated a 0.3 MPa compressive load on the human lumbar IVD at the optimal mesh density and material properties determined from the bovine model and then examined the resultant internal strains.
resultsThe scaled mesh density demonstrated excellent correspondence with the experimental results, confirming that accuracy was not compromised. Both the ballistic gel and the IVD samples exhibited a wide range of internal strains. The NP of the IVD underwent greater deformation than the AF under loading.
conclusionsThis study validated a strategy for mesh optimization and FEM of soft biological materials from data generated from MRI scans. This calibrated approach allows for the rapid examination of internal strain distributions medical images that can be performed on the order of minutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.