ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020
Prostate cancer evaluation using PET quantification in
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound with clinical indicators in the prediction of bone metastasis in prostate cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Efficacy ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Unexpected discovery of prostatic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after thulium laser vaporization in a patient with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- The impact of MR-based attenuation correction in spinal cord FDG-PET/MR imaging for neurological studies.Medical physics · 2021Article
- An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTissues with low magnetic resonance (MR) signals, such as bones and lungs differ considerably in their attenuation properties, requiring special considerations for attenuation correction. We evaluated the impact of using the five-compartment segmentation model, which incorporates bones, in
methodsProstate cancer patients underwent dedicated prostate
resultsTwenty-six patients (mean age 69.4±9.3 years) were included in the study. Twenty-five patients presented for prostate cancer staging and one patient was evaluated for recurrent disease. There was a statistically significant difference between SUVs of the gluteus, sacrum, prostatic lesions and normal prostate tissue measured by the four-compartment
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.