Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31956327›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Consequences of Making the Inactive Active Through Changes in Antisense Oligonucleotide Chemistries.

Khine Zaw, Kane Greer, May Thandar Aung-Htut, Chalermchai Mitrpant, Rakesh N Veedu, Sue Fletcher, Steve D Wilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Khine ZawCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Kane GreerCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
May Thandar Aung-HtutCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Chalermchai MitrpantDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rakesh N VeeduCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sue FletcherCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Steve D WiltonCentre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUMahidol University · THMurdoch University · AUPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antisense oligonucleotides are short, single-stranded nucleic acid analogues that can interfere with pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) processing and induce excision of a targeted exon from the mature transcript. When developing a panel of antisense oligonucleotides to skip every dystrophin exon, we found great variation in splice switching efficiencies, with some antisense oligonucleotides ineffective, even when directed to canonical splice sites and transfected into cells at high concentrations. In this study, we re-evaluated some of these ineffective antisense oligonucleotide sequences after incorporation of locked nucleic acid residues to increase annealing potential. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting exons 16, 23, and 51 of human

Indexed as

antisense oligonucleotidecryptic splice siteDMDlocked nucleic acidlocked nucleic acid/2′-O-methyl mixmer

Identifiers

PMID31956327
PMCPMC6951410
OpenAlexW2987954841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.