Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31956301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

A Urodynamic Comparison of Neural Targets for Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation to Acutely Suppress Detrusor Contractions Following Spinal Cord Injury.

Sean Doherty, Anne Vanhoestenberghe, Lynsey Duffell, Rizwan Hamid, Sarah Knight

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05504200 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Restoration of Function of Co-ordinated Bladder Storage and Voiding Following Spinal Cord Injury by Combination of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Bladder & Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorRNOH RICRan2022 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsBladder and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
NCT07578532 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Sacral Neuromodulation Techniques-Magnetic Stimulation and Electrical Stimulation-on Detrusor Overactivity in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Detrusor OveractivityArmsTranscutaneous Sacral Electrical Stimulation, Transcutaneous sacral magnetic stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean DohertyAspire Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technologies, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne VanhoestenbergheAspire Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technologies, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lynsey DuffellAspire Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technologies, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rizwan HamidLondon Spinal Cord Injury Centre, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah KnightLondon Spinal Cord Injury Centre, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess and compare the effect of transcutaneous Dorsal Genital Nerve Stimulation (DGNS), Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TNS), Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS), and Spinal Stimulation (SS) on Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO) and bladder capacity in people with Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). MATERIALS AND

methodsSeven male participants with supra-sacral SCI were tested. Standard cystometry (CMG) was performed to assess bladder activity at baseline and with stimulation applied at each site. This was conducted over four separate sessions. All stimulation was monophasic, 15 Hz, 200 μS pulses and applied at maximum tolerable amplitude. Results were analysed against individual control results from within the same session.

resultsDorsal Genital Nerve Stimulation increased bladder capacity by 153 ± 146 ml (

conclusionIn this pilot study DGNS acutely suppressed detrusor contractions and increased bladder capacity whereas TNS, SNS, and SS did not. This is the first within individual comparison of surface stimulation sites for management of NDO in SCI individuals.

Indexed as

bladderelectrical stimulationincontinenceneurogenic detrusor overactivityneuromodulationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31956301
PMCPMC6951414
OpenAlexW2991945036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.