Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31955902›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2020

A Hierarchy of Autonomous Systems for Vocal Production.

Yisi S Zhang, Asif A Ghazanfar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Altricial brains and the evolution of infant vocal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The breath shape controls intonation of mouse vocalizations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Roles for cerebellum and subsumption architecture in central pattern generation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Active Sampling in Primate Vocal Interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. The neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Interoceptive rhythms in the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yisi S ZhangPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: yz9@princeton.edu.
Asif A GhazanfarPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: asifg@princeton.edu.
Princeton University · US

Funding

The social neurobiology of vocal production and perceptionR01NS054898 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GHAZANFAR, ASIF · 2007 to 2022
$5.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal production is hierarchical in the time domain. These hierarchies build upon biomechanical and neural dynamics across various timescales. We review studies in marmoset monkeys, songbirds, and other vertebrates. To organize these data in an accessible and across-species framework, we interpret the different timescales of vocal production as belonging to different levels of an autonomous systems hierarchy. The first level accounts for vocal acoustics produced on short timescales; subsequent levels account for longer timescales of vocal output. The hierarchy of autonomous systems that we put forth accounts for vocal patterning, sequence generation, dyadic interactions, and context dependence by sequentially incorporating central pattern generators, intrinsic drives, and sensory signals from the environment. We then show the framework's utility by providing an integrative explanation of infant vocal production learning in which social feedback modulates infant vocal acoustics through the tuning of a drive signal.

Indexed as

AcousticsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsCallithrixbiomechanicsbirdsongdynamical systemmarmoset monkeyMayer waveparental feedbackslow oscillationssocial reinforcementtimescalesvocalizations

Identifiers

PMID31955902
PMCPMC7213988
OpenAlexW2999179387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.