Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31955710›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2020

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Nivantha Naidoo, Van Thu Nguyen, Philippe Ravaud, Bridget Young, Philippe Amiel, Daniel Schanté, Mike Clarke, Isabelle Boutron

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07737990 (Psilocybin-Assisted Group Integration Psychotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07737990 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Psilocybin-Assisted Group Integration Psychotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoshua RosenblatRan2026 to 2030Enrolled65ConditionsTreatment-resistant Depression (TRD)ArmsGroup integration therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nivantha NaidooUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France.
Van Thu NguyenUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France.
Philippe RavaudUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France.
Bridget YoungDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
Philippe AmielINSERM U 1123 ECEVE (Clinical Epidemiology, Economic, Evaluation, Vulnerable populations), University Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Daniel SchantéJusqu'A La Mort Accompagner la Vie (JALMALV), Strasbourg, France.
Mike ClarkeQueen's University Belfast School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Isabelle BoutronUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France. isabelle.boutron@aphp.fr.
Université Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRColumbia University · USInstitut National du Cancer · FRQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/249/01Medical Research Council G0901530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be quite demanding and could represent an important burden for patients. We aimed to explore this research burden (i.e., the psychological, physical, and financial burdens) experienced by patients through their participation in a RCT.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies exploring adult patients' experiences with RCT participation. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, and Embase (search date March 2018) for eligible reports. Qualitative data coding and indexing were assisted by NVivo. The quality of reports was assessed by using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool.

resultsWe included 45 qualitative studies that involved 1732 RCT participants. Important psychological burdens were identified at every stage of the trial process. Participants reported feeling anxiety and being afraid of "being a 'guinea pig'" and described undergoing randomization and allocation to a placebo as particularly difficult resulting in disappointment, anger, and depression. Patients' follow-up and trial closure were also responsible for a wide range of psychological, physical, and financial burdens. Furthermore, factors related to burdensome impacts and consequences were discerned. These factors involved trial information, poorly organized and too-demanding follow-up, and lack of appropriate management when the patient's participation ended. Trial participation was also associated with beneficial effects such as the satisfaction of feeling "useful," gaining "a sense of control," and receiving special attention.

conclusionsOur finding provides a detailed description of research burden across the whole RCT process. Many of the burdens described could be anticipated, and some avoided in a movement toward minimally disruptive clinical research. Such an approach could improve trial recruitment and retention. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018098994.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicCost of IllnessHumansQualitative ResearchVolunteersRandomized controlled trialsResearch burdenTrial participation

Identifiers

PMID31955710
PMCPMC6970283
OpenAlexW2999900278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.