The gender responsiveness of social marketing interventions focused on neglected tropical diseases.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

1. The concept of intersectionality in bioethics: a systematic review.BMC medical ethics · 2024
   Pooled it
2. Social marketing interventions for the prevention and control of neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
   Pooled it
3. Is noma a neglected/overlooked tropical disease?Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
   Article
4. Women's participation in the prevention and control of dengue using environmental methods in the global south: a qualitative meta-synthesis.International journal for equity in health · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as