ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020
Brief Report: Assessment Experiences of Children with Neurogenetic Syndromes: Caregivers' Perceptions and Suggestions for Improvement.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delineating clinical and developmental outcomes in STXBP1-related disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Making Research Possible: Barriers and Solutions For Those With ASD and ID.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Mobile-Health Technologies for a Child Neuropsychiatry Service: Development and Usability of the Assioma Digital Platform.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Bringing the Laboratory Home: PANDABox Telehealth-Based Assessment of Neurodevelopmental Risk in Children.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well-recognized that measurement options for diagnosing and monitoring children with neurogenetic syndromes (NGS) associated with moderate to severe intellectual impairment are limited (Berry-Kravis, Dev Med Child Neurol https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13018, 2016), and caregivers experience significant concerns regarding the assessment process. However to date, these concerns have not been summarized into actionable steps for clinicians and test-makers. As such, we used a mixed methods approach to assess caregiver-derived perceptions and suggestions for improving assessments in NGS. Results indicated many shared challenges and suggestions for improvement, particularly in the domains of testing procedures and examiner communication. Integrating these suggestions into future protocols is an important next step toward improving the quality of assessment procedures for children with NGS and their families across both clinical and research contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.