Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31955301›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2020

Transcriptomic profiling sheds light on the blue-light and red-light response of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus).

Huan Wang, Xidan Tong, Fenghua Tian, Chuanwen Jia, Changtian Li, Yu Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Near-Infrared Excited MnMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The development and nutritional quality ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huan WangDepartment of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China.
Xidan TongDepartment of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China.
Fenghua TianDepartment of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, People's Republic of China.
Chuanwen JiaDepartment of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China.
Changtian LiDepartment of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China. fungi966@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-7210
Jilin Agricultural University · CNGuizhou University · CN

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2017M610197Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2018T110262Program of Creation and Utilization of Germplasm of Mushroom Crop of "111" Project D17014Special Fund for Agro-scientifc Research in the Public Interest 201503137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blue light is an important environmental factor that induces mushroom primordium differentiation and fruiting body development. Although blue-light treatment has been applied for the production of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), the blue-light response mechanisms of P. ostreatus still remain unclear. In the present study, we exposed the primordium of P. ostreatus to blue-light, red-light, and dark conditions for 7 days. Subsequently, comparative transcriptomics analysis of the stipe, pileus, and gill under the three light conditions was performed to reveal the gene expression response mechanism of P. ostreatus to blue light and red light. The results showed that blue light enhanced the growth and development of all the three organs of P. ostreatus, especially the pileus. In contrast, red light slightly (non-significantly) inhibited pileus growth. When compared with red-light and dark treatments, blue-light treatment significantly upregulated gene expression involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, the pentose phosphate pathway and the peroxisome in the pileus, but not in the gill or stipe. Most of the glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway genes were upregulated in the pileus by blue light. When compared with dark treatment, red-light treatment downregulated the expression of many respiration metabolism genes in the pileus. These results revealed that blue light enhanced the activation of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway, whereas red light weakened glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway activation. The conclusion can be drawn that blue light improved P. ostreatus fruiting body (particularly, the pileus) growth rate via enhancement of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway.

Indexed as

Blue-lightGene expressionGlycolysisMushroomPileus growthRed-light

Identifiers

PMID31955301
PMCPMC6969877
OpenAlexW3008982810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.