ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020
Utility of image fusion software in identifying shunt malfunction.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric shunt malfunction occurs frequently and is important to recognize due to the high associated morbidity and mortality. Although neuroimaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, it remains imperfect. We sought to identify the effect of image fusion software in predicting shunt malfunction.
methodsA total of 248 rapid shunt series brain MRIs performed between 2013 and 2017 were compared with prior neuroimaging for changes in ventricular size by two methods: radiology report and Brainlab fusion. Shunt malfunction was defined by an operative report confirming malfunction within 72 h of neuroimaging. The two methods were compared by logistic regression models, with sensitivity and specificity subsequently calculated.
resultsShunt malfunction was identified in 40 cases (16.1%). Imaging report demonstrated a lower Akaike information criterion than the Brainlab fusion and is therefore a better fitting model. While sensitivity is similar for the two models, 0.94 (0.90 to 0.97, 95% CI) for imaging report, and 0.95 (0.91 to 0.98, 95% CI) for Brainlab, the specificity was significantly different, 0.50 (0.37 to 0.63, 95% CI) and 0.33 (0.24 to 0.44, 95% CI) respectively.
conclusionsOur data indicate that an increased ability to detect subtle changes in ventricular size does not translate to improved accuracy, but instead leads to decreased specificity, and therefore an overdiagnosis of shunt malfunction in children with normally functioning shunts. While imaging continues to play a prominent role in the identification of shunt malfunction, neurosurgical clinical evaluation remains crucial to the final diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.