ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects2020
Identification of novel RNA design candidates by clustering the extended RNA-As-Graphs library.
Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viral RNAs as Dual Graphs: Extending the Motif Universe of RNAs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Open questions on viral frameshifting: Exploiting the structural plasticity of the frameshifting element for therapeutic intervention.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- How large is the universe of RNA-like motifs? A clustering analysis of RNA graph motifs using topological descriptors.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Article
- A Fiedler Vector Scoring Approach for Novel RNA Motif Selection.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- The Multiscale Future of RNA Modeling.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe re-evaluate our RNA-As-Graphs clustering approach, using our expanded graph library and new RNA structures, to identify potential RNA-like topologies for design. Our coarse-grained approach represents RNA secondary structures as tree and dual graphs, with vertices and edges corresponding to RNA helices and loops. The graph theoretical framework facilitates graph enumeration, partitioning, and clustering approaches to study RNA structure and its applications.
methodsClustering graph topologies based on features derived from graph Laplacian matrices and known RNA structures allows us to classify topologies into 'existing' or hypothetical, and the latter into, 'RNA-like' or 'non RNA-like' topologies. Here we update our list of existing tree graph topologies and RAG-3D database of atomic fragments to include newly determined RNA structures. We then use linear and quadratic regression, optionally with dimensionality reduction, to derive graph features and apply several clustering algorithms on our tree-graph library and recently expanded dual-graph library to classify them into the three groups.
resultsThe unsupervised PAM and K-means clustering approaches correctly classify 72-77% of all existing graph topologies and 75-82% of newly added ones as RNA-like. For supervised k-NN clustering, the cross-validation accuracy ranges from 57 to 81%.
conclusionsUsing linear regression with unsupervised clustering, or quadratic regression with supervised clustering, provides better accuracies than supervised/linear clustering. All accuracies are better than random, especially for newly added existing topologies, thus lending credibility to our approach. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our updated RAG-3D database and motif classification by clustering present new RNA substructures and RNA-like motifs as novel design candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.