Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31954701›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21

Lior Drukker, Eleonora Staines-Urias, José Villar, Fernando C Barros, Maria Carvalho, Shama Munim, Rose McGready, Francois Nosten, James A Berkley, Shane A Norris and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modified umbilical artery Doppler scoring system based on multisite assessment: association with perinatal outcome in early and late fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors affecting the umbilical artery Doppler reference values in the second and third trimesters.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Longitudinal fetal growth parameters in women at high risk for pre-eclampsia.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  11. Effect of Initial Glucose Tolerance Test Response on Pregnancy Outcomes in Type A1 Gestational Diabetes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How maternal position affects umbilical and middle cerebral artery Doppler indices: insights from a scoping review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Peripheral cord insertion is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome only when accompanied by clinically significant placental pathology.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lior DrukkerNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eleonora Staines-UriasNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
José VillarNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fernando C BarrosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Comportamento, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Maria CarvalhoFaculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shama MunimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rose McGreadyCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Francois NostenCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
James A BerkleyCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Shane A NorrisSAMRC Development Pathway for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ricardo UauyDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health Interventions Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Division of Paediatrics, Pontifical Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Stephen H KennedyNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aris T PapageorghiouNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: aris.papageorghiou@wrh.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReference values for umbilical artery Doppler indices are used clinically to assess fetal well-being. However, many studies that have produced reference charts have important methodologic limitations, and these result in significant heterogeneity of reported reference ranges.

objectivesTo produce international gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices based on longitudinal data and the same rigorous methodology used in the original Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21 STUDY

designIn Phase II of the INTERGROWTH-21

resultsOf the women enrolled at the 3 sites, 1629 were eligible for this study; 431 (27%) met the entry criteria for the construction of normative centiles, similar to the proportion seen in the original fetal growth longitudinal study. They contributed a total of 1243 Doppler measures to the analysis; 74% had 3 measures or more. The healthy low-risk status of the population was confirmed by the low rates of preterm birth (4.9%) and preeclampsia (0.7%). There were no neonatal deaths and satisfactory growth, health, and motor development of the infants at 1 and 2 years of age were documented. Only a very small proportion (2.8%-6.5%) of the variance of Doppler indices was due to between-site differences; in addition, standardized site difference estimates were marginally outside this threshold in only 1 of 27 comparisons, and this supported the decision to pool data from the 3 study sites. All 3 Doppler indices decreased with advancing gestational age. The 3rd, 5th 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th, and 97th centiles according to gestational age for each of the 3 indices are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any value as a centile and z scores. The mean pulsatility index according to gestational age = 1.02944 + 77.7456*(gestational age)

conclusionWe present here international gestational age-specific normative centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices produced by studying healthy, low-risk pregnant women living in environments with minimal constraints on fetal growth. The centiles complement the existing INTERGROWTH-21

Indexed as

Gestational AgeAdultBlood Flow VelocityBrazilChild DevelopmentCohort StudiesDiastoleFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKenyaLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyantepartum testingDopplerfetal growth restrictionfetal well-beingINTERBIOINTERGROWTH-21(st) ultrasoundlongitudinal studymultinational studyperinatal morbidityperinatal mortalityplacentapulsatility indexreference rangesresistance indexsystolic/diastolic ratioumbilical artery

Identifiers

PMID31954701
PMCPMC7287403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.