Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31954526›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2020

Diverse Mechanisms of Sound Frequency Discrimination in the Vertebrate Cochlea.

Robert Fettiplace

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Electroreceptors with a different kind of buzz.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Remarkable Outer Hair Cell: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of W. E. Brownell.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  20. Alternative splicing in shaping the molecular landscape of the cochlea.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert FettiplaceDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: fettiplace@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

INTRACELLULAR CALCIUM IN HAIR CELLSR01DC001362 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERT FETTIPLACE · 1992 to 2026
$11.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination of different sound frequencies is pivotal to recognizing and localizing friend and foe. Here, I review the various hair cell-tuning mechanisms used among vertebrates. Electrical resonance, filtering of the receptor potential by voltage-dependent ion channels, is ubiquitous in all non-mammals, but has an upper limit of ~1 kHz. The frequency range is extended by mechanical resonance of the hair bundles in frogs and lizards, but may need active hair-bundle motion to achieve sharp tuning up to 5 kHz. Tuning in mammals uses somatic motility of outer hair cells, underpinned by the membrane protein prestin, to expand the frequency range. The bird cochlea may also use prestin at high frequencies, but hair cells <1 kHz show electrical resonance.

Indexed as

CochleaHearingAnimalsAuditory PerceptionHair Cells, Auditory, OuterMammalsbasilar papillaelectrical resonancehair bundlehair cellsprestin

Identifiers

PMID31954526
PMCPMC7015066
OpenAlexW3000570278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.