Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31954493›Full record

ReviewJournal of hepatology2020

mRECIST for HCC: Performance and novel refinements.

Josep M Llovet, Riccardo Lencioni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05185505 (Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Pre-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria), which is not on this map. Cited by 467 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
467citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05185505 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Pre-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2023 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Hepatocellular CancerArmsAtezolizumab, Bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

467 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

407 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Josep M LlovetTranslational Research in Hepatic Oncology Group, Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Electronic address: jmllovet@clinic.cat.
Riccardo LencioniDepartment of Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

THE TISCH CANCER INSTITUTE - CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA196521 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Deanna L Benson · 2015 to 2026
$35.4M
Cancer Research UK 26813NCI NIH HHS P30 CA196521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010, modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria were proposed as a way of adapting the RECIST criteria to the particularities of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We intended to overcome some limitations of RECIST in measuring tumour shrinkage with local and systemic therapies, and also to refine the assessment of progression that could be misinterpreted with conventional RECIST 1.1, due to clinical events related to the natural progression of chronic liver disease (development of ascites, enlargement of lymph nodes, etc.). mRECIST has served its purpose since being adopted or included in clinical practice guidelines (European, American and Asian) for the management of HCC; it has also been instrumental for assessing response and time-to-event endpoints in several phase II and III investigations. Nowadays, mRECIST has become the standard tool for measurement of radiological endpoints at early/intermediate stages of HCC. At advanced stages, guidelines recommend both methods. mRECIST has been proven to capture higher objective response rates in tumours treated with molecular therapies and those responses have shown to be independently associated with better survival. With the advent of novel treatment approaches (i.e. immunotherapy) and combination therapies there is a need to further refine and clarify some concepts around the performance of mRECIST. Similarly, changes in the landscape of standard of care at advanced stages of the disease are pointing towards progression-free survival as a potential primary endpoint in some phase III investigations, as effective therapies applied beyond progression might mask overall survival results. Strict recommendations for adopting this endpoint have been reported. Overall, we review the performance of mRECIST during the last decade, incorporating novel clarifications and refinements in light of emerging challenges in the study and management of HCC.

Indexed as

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsEndpointsLiver cancermRECIST, RECIST, trial designSystemic therapies

Identifiers

PMID31954493
PMCPMC12452114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.