ArticleClinical imaging2020
Technical and nidus-specific factors associated with adequacy of intraprocedural biopsy samples preceding radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- To biopsy or not to biopsy: a retrospective review of presumed osteoid osteomas treated by radiofrequency ablation.European radiology · 2025Article
- The effect of radiofrequency ablation on pain score and non-steroidal painkiller use in osteoid osteoma patients.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Avoiding Misdiagnosis and Missed Diagnosis for Appropriately Treating Spinal Osteoid Osteomas: A Single-Center Experience.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Review
- Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings on Management of Symptomatic Patients Following Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Osteoid Osteoma (OO).SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine the diagnostic yield of intraprocedural percutaneous biopsy performed at the time of radiofrequency ablation of suspected Osteoid Osteoma (OO) and identify technical and nidus-specific factors associated with diagnostic adequacy. MATERIALS AND
methodsFollowing IRB approval, a total of 42 patients (male: 28, female: 14; mean age: 29 years) who underwent intraprocedural biopsy immediately prior to RFA between June 2010 and June 2017 were retrospectively identified. The nidi were located in various locations. The nidi had a mean size of 6.3 mm (range: 3-11 mm, Standard deviation (SD): 2.26). Core biopsies were performed by one of 15 operators. Biopsies were performed with two needle types ranging from 11-G to 15-G with a mean number of samples of 1.8 (range: 1-5, SD: 1.01). Electronic records and imaging were reviewed for demographics, nidus characteristics, biopsy details and diagnostic yield. Multivariate logistic regression of nidus-specific and biopsy-specific factors was performed.
resultsA total of 22/42 (52.3%) of the biopsies were adequate for histological diagnosis of OO. For the two experienced operators, the diagnostic yield was 67% (6/9) and 80% (8/10). Biopsy adequacy was significantly correlated with presence of an osteoid matrix (p = 0.03), obtaining >1 core sample (p = 0.03), the needle track passing through the nidus (p = 0.0003) and thinner (2.5 mm) intraprocedural CT slices (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, use of thinner intraprocedural CT slices was found to be associated with adequate biopsy (p = 0.02).
conclusionIntraprocedural percutaneous biopsy samples of nidi highly-suspected to be OO at the time of RFA were diagnostic in 52% of patients. Multivariate analysis shows thinner intraprocedural CT slices to be a significantly associated with biopsy adequacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.