Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953801›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Dominican Provider Practices for Cervical Cancer Screening in Santo Domingo and Monte Plata Provinces.

Erica Liebermann, Marilyn J Hammer, Natalia Frías Gúzman, Nancy Van Devanter, Danielle Ompad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erica LiebermannNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, 433 First Avenue, 6th floor, New York, NY, 10010, USA. ejl472@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-6443
Marilyn J HammerPhyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, LW523, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Natalia Frías GúzmanInstituto Nacional de Cáncer Rosa Emilia Sánchez Pérez de Tavares (INCART), Avenida Correa y Cidrón, 10103, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Nancy Van DevanterNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, 433 First Avenue, Rm 670, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Danielle OmpadNew York University College of Global Public Health, 715 Broadway, Rm 1011, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001447 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MICOLI, KEITH J. · 2015 to 2025
$5.9M
NCATS NIH HHS CTSA grant TL1 TR001447NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death for women in the Dominican Republic. Pap smear screening in the Dominican Republic has not achieved adequate reduction in cervical cancer mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine Dominican provider practices for cervical cancer screening and the use of national or international screening guidelines. We surveyed 101 gynecology specialists, 50 non-specialists, and 51 obstetrics-gynecology residents in the Santo Domingo and Monte Plata provinces of the Dominican Republic regarding their cervical cancer screening practices and use of guidelines. Bivariate (chi-square) analyses were conducted to compare screening practices by demographic and practice characteristics. The majority of providers followed WHO guidelines (62.9%) and/or Dominican national norms (59.4%). The majority (87%) of providers use time since first sexual activity as the basis for screening initiation; 96% advise screening every 6-12 months. The most commonly used screening test is the conventional Pap smear. Colposcopy was recommended most often for all abnormal Pap results. Dominican providers report they follow national and/or international cervical cancer screening guidelines. They do not follow age-based screening guidelines, nor have they adopted an extended interval for screening and continue to recommend screening at least annually. A culture of early and frequent screening has consequences in terms of cost, high demand for follow-up services, and reduced capacity to reach the populations at highest risk. Early screening also may challenge the acceptability of adopting alternative screening technologies such as HPV testing.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestPregnancyVaginal SmearsCervical cancer screeningDominican RepublicGlobal women’s healthLatin America and the Caribbean

Identifiers

PMID31953801
PMCPMC9743805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.