Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953774›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2020

The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in real-world practice: long-term follow-up of the AMC Single Centre Real World PCI Registry.

R Y G Tijssen, M E Annink, R P Kraak, K T Koch, J Baan, M M Vis, J J Piek, J P S Henriques, R J de Winter, M A M Beijk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical science, responsibilities and society.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R Y G TijssenDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M E AnninkDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R P KraakDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K T KochDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J BaanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M M VisDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J J PiekDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J P S HenriquesDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R J de WinterDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A M BeijkDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J J WykrzykowskaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. joannawykrzykowska70@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioresorbable scaffolds have been introduced to overcome the shortcomings of drug-eluting stents. Higher rates of device thrombosis, however, have been reported up to 3 years after implantation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). In the current article, we therefore report long-term clinical outcomes of the AMC Absorb Registry. METHODS AND

resultsIn the AMC Absorb Registry, all patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with Absorb BVS implantation between 30 August 2012 and 5 August 2013 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre-Academic Medical Centre were included. The composite endpoint of this analysis was target-vessel failure (TVF). The median follow-up of the study cohort of the AMC Absorb Registry was 1534 days. At the time of the cross-sectional data sweep the clinical status at 4 years was known in 124 of 135 patients (91.9%). At long-term follow-up, the composite endpoint of TVF had occurred in 27 patients. The 4‑year Kaplan-Meier estimate of TVF was 19.8%. At 4 years cardiac death had occurred in 4 patients (3.2%) and target-vessel myocardial infarction in 9 (6.9%) patients. Definite scaffold thrombosis occurred in 5 (3.8%) patients. We found 1 case of very late scaffold thrombosis that occurred at 911 days after device implantation in a patient who was not on dual anti-platelet therapy.

conclusionIn a patient population reflecting routine clinical practice, we found that cases of TVF continued to accrue beyond 2 years after Absorb BVS implantation.

Indexed as

Bioresorbable scaffoldsScaffold thrombosisTarget-vessel failure

Identifiers

PMID31953774
PMCPMC7052095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.