Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953739›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2020

Ocular and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Brimonidine and Timolol After Topical Administration in Rabbits: Comparison Between Fixed-Combination and Single Drugs.

Gen Suzuki, Eriko Kunikane, Keisuke Shinno, Seiko Kozai, Masaaki Kurata, Akio Kawamura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gen SuzukiResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. gen-suzuki@senju.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-971X
Eriko KunikaneResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Keisuke ShinnoResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Seiko KozaiResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Masaaki KurataResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Akio KawamuraResearch and Development Division, Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Senju Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study was aimed to compare ocular tissue distribution and systemic exposure of brimonidine and timolol after single topical administration to rabbits of fixed-combination ophthalmic solution of 0.1% brimonidine tartrate and 0.5% timolol and single drugs (0.1% brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution or 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution) or concomitant administration of single drugs.

methodsRabbits were treated with a single topical administration of each ophthalmic solution or concomitant administration of single drugs. For concomitant administration, 0.1% brimonidine tartrate was administered after 0.5% timolol instillation successively within 10 s (without interval) or with 5-min intervals. Brimonidine and timolol concentrations in the aqueous humor, retina/choroid, vitreous body, and plasma were determined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

resultsThe area under the curve values of both drugs in the aqueous humor after fixed-combination administration were comparable to those after concomitant administration. The value of brimonidine was comparable to that after 0.1% brimonidine tartrate administration, whereas the value of timolol was 1.6-fold higher than that after 0.5% timolol administration. The plasma area under the curve value of brimonidine did not differ between fixed-combination and single-drug administrations, but that of timolol was higher after fixed-combination administration than after single-drug administration. Similar concentration-time curves of brimonidine were observed in the posterior ocular tissues in all groups. For concomitant administration, both drug concentrations in the aqueous humor without an administration interval were lower than those with 5-min intervals.

conclusionThere was no difference in the effect of formulation compositions on ocular and systemic pharmacokinetics among the ophthalmic solutions, but brimonidine may alter the ocular and systemic absorption of timolol, which is possibly due to its pharmacologic action. We demonstrated the importance of an administration interval in the concomitant administration of these drugs. This concern could be avoided by using a fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol.

Indexed as

Administration intervalBrimonidineFixed-combination ophthalmic solutionOcular pharmacokineticsTimolol

Identifiers

PMID31953739
PMCPMC7054494
OpenAlexW3000708283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.