Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953738›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2020

Laser-induced fluorescence diagnosis of stomach tumor.

Maxim Loshchenov, Vladimir Levkin, Nina Kalyagina, Kirill Linkov, Sergey Kharnas, Kanamat Efendiev, Pavel Kharnas, Victor Loschenov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maxim LoshchenovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Vladimir LevkinI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Nina KalyaginaProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation. Nina.Kalyagina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0890-5889
Kirill LinkovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Sergey KharnasI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Kanamat EfendievNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Pavel KharnasRussian State Social University (RSSU), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Victor LoschenovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Prokhorov General Physics Institute · RUSechenov University · RUNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI · RURussian State Social University · RU

Funding

MEPhI Academic Excellence Project 02.a03.21.0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the capabilities of laser spectral and video fluorescence diagnosis used for stomach tumors using 5-ALA photosensitizer. The spectroscopic method is presented with an example of a characteristic fluorescence spectrum from stomach with 5-ALA and quantitative statistics. The laser excitation wavelength was 632.8 nm. The analysis of the video system is presented with clinical statistics. The penetration depth of 3-4 mm of the He-Ne laser during the spectroscopic study allowed for scanning the mucous and submucous layers of the stomach and for detecting tumorous growths in these layers. Registration of fluorescence using the spectral system enabled surgeons to conduct express estimation of dubious stomach tissues, to make biopsy from doubtful areas to reveal precancer and early cancer states. The video fluorescence analysis with the application of 5-ALA-induced PPIX may be recommended for the use as an express method of diagnosis including early diagnosis of malignant stomach diseases as well as for intraoperative assessment of tumor extension and detection of canceromatous foci during laparoscopy. The optimal time interval for the diagnosis (regardless of the nature of the study - endoscopic, laparoscopic, or intraoperative) is 2-4 h from the administration of photosensitizer. The optimal dose of the photosensitizer is 20 mg per 1 kg of the body weight.

Indexed as

LasersAgedAminolevulinic AcidFemaleFluorescenceGastroscopyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPhotosensitizing AgentsPolypsStomach NeoplasmsAminolevulinic AcidPhotosensitizing Agents5-ALAFluorescenceGastric cancerSpectroscopyStomach diagnosisVideo fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID31953738
OpenAlexW2999927877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.