Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953628›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Clinical Ontologies Improve Case Finding of Primary Biliary Cholangitis in UK Primary and Secondary Care.

Marinos Pericleous, Claire Kelly, Joseph A Odin, Yiannis Kallis, Chris McGee, Julian Sherlock, Ivelina Yonova, Simon de Lusignan, Aftab Ala

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marinos PericleousDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-9137
Claire KellyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Joseph A OdinIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Yiannis KallisDepartment of Hepatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Chris McGeeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Julian SherlockDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Ivelina YonovaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Simon de LusignanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Aftab AlaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK. aftab.ala1@nhs.net.
University of Surrey · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKing's College - North Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPBC registries in the UK focus on data from secondary care without clear coordinated contribution from primary care. The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) receives data from > 500 primary care practices (PCPs). Notably, the Lancet commissioning group is extracting data from the RCGP RSC database to shape UK policy on liver disease.

aimsTo create a novel ontology to facilitate PBC case finding from primary care provider (PCP) records.

methodsRCGP RSC data were collected from participating PCPs in the county of Surrey, UK. PBC diagnostic criteria of the AASLD and EASL guidelines were used to develop 725 data codes to facilitate patient record searches. A scoring system built into the ontology allowed categorization of cases as PBC definite, PBC probable, and PBC unlikely.

resultsA total of 218,099 records were searched from participating PCPs. Of these, there were 58 PBC definite, 2317 PBC probable, and 215,724 PBC unlikely patients. There were 32 PBC definite patients who did not match to our regional PBC database and were henceforth included as new-found cases. Two of these cases were not labeled as PBC by the PCP. From the PBC unlikely group, 7/215,724 (0.003%) patients were labeled as PBC in secondary care records; however, none of them were coded as having PBC by their PCPs.

conclusionsUtilization of the UK National RCGP RSC database supported by novel ontology score has successfully helped us identify (i) new cases of PBC not known to local/regional secondary care providers and (ii) de novo PBC cases. There are many PBC probable cases whose data merit further careful evaluation.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSecondary Health CareCatchment Area, HealthCholangitisFeasibility StudiesHumansRegistriesUnited KingdomCase findingOntologyPrimary biliary cholangitisPrimary careSecondary care

Identifiers

PMID31953628
OpenAlexW2999430353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.