ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020
Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy to the skull: case-based review.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurosurgical Treatment and Outcome of Pediatric Skull Base Lesions: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: A narrative review of dental aspects.The Saudi dental journal · 2023Review
- Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy: the Use of Immunohistochemical Analysis.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2022Article
- A case report of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy complicated with congenital heart disease and hypothyroidism.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy successfully treated with metformin: A case report.Medicine · 2020Article
- Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Melanocytic Neuroectodermal Tumour of Infancy-A Rare Case Report.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
- Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumour of Infancy - A Case Report and Review of Literature.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) is a rare tumor, which usually occurs in infants under the age of one. Early diagnosis and radical surgery seem to be critical for long-term cure. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of a 4-month-old boy with a MNTI to the skull. The mass was first noticed at 4 month of age and grew very rapidly over a time of 2 weeks. Initially, a fine needle biopsy ruled out a sarcoma and led to the diagnosis. The tumor originated from the sphenoid wing and infiltrated the frontotemporal bone, the lateral wall of the right orbit, and the underlying dura mater. A total excision of the tumor, including the adjacent bone and dura, was achieved. Reconstruction of the bone was performed using absorbable plates and Tutobone. Histology confirmed the initial diagnosis, while molecular diagnosis showed high conformity of the MNTI with medulloblastoma group 3. The patient recovered well, while the reconstruction led to a good cosmetic result. A local recurrence occurred leading to a single-dose chemotherapy with Vincristine and a second surgery after 15 weeks. Thereafter, the patient developed recurrent large pseudomeningocele, which was treated by multiple shunt procedures and finally reconstruction of the bone using Palacos. Radiological follow-up 3 months after the second resection showed no tumor recurrence.
conclusionRadical surgery for MNTI is to date the gold standard since it seems to minimize recurrence rates. Because of the rapid and destructive growth within the bone, reconstruction is necessary, which can be very challenging in infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.