Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953462›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Deep neural networks for automated detection of marine mammal species.

Yu Shiu, K J Palmer, Marie A Roch, Erica Fleishman, Xiaobai Liu, Eva-Marie Nosal, Tyler Helble, Danielle Cholewiak, Douglas Gillespie, Holger Klinck

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Automating timeScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrating cultural dimensions in sperm whale (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Extensive data engineering to the rescue: building a multi-species katydid detector from unbalanced, atypical training datasets.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu Shiu *Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA. ys587@cornell.edu.
K J Palmer *Department of Computer Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Marie A RochDepartment of Computer Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Erica FleishmanDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Xiaobai LiuDepartment of Computer Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Eva-Marie NosalDepartment of Ocean and Resources Engineering, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.
Tyler HelbleUS Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, System Center Pacific, San Diego, CA, 92152, USA.
Danielle CholewiakNortheast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA.
Douglas GillespieSea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, Scotland.
Holger KlinckCenter for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks have advanced the field of detection and classification and allowed for effective identification of signals in challenging data sets. Numerous time-critical conservation needs may benefit from these methods. We developed and empirically studied a variety of deep neural networks to detect the vocalizations of endangered North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). We compared the performance of these deep architectures to that of traditional detection algorithms for the primary vocalization produced by this species, the upcall. We show that deep-learning architectures are capable of producing false-positive rates that are orders of magnitude lower than alternative algorithms while substantially increasing the ability to detect calls. We demonstrate that a deep neural network trained with recordings from a single geographic region recorded over a span of days is capable of generalizing well to data from multiple years and across the species' range, and that the low false positives make the output of the algorithm amenable to quality control for verification. The deep neural networks we developed are relatively easy to implement with existing software, and may provide new insights applicable to the conservation of endangered species.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesAnimalsCaniformiaConservation of Natural ResourcesDeep LearningEmpirical ResearchHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerVocalization, AnimalWhales

Identifiers

PMID31953462
PMCPMC6969184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.