Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Human antibodies neutralizing diphtheria toxin in vitro and in vivo.

Esther Veronika Wenzel, Margarita Bosnak, Robert Tierney, Maren Schubert, Jeffrey Brown, Stefan Dübel, Androulla Efstratiou, Dorothea Sesardic, Paul Stickings, Michael Hust

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diphtheria antitoxin treatment: from pioneer to neglected.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AB Toxins as High-Affinity Ligands for Cell Targeting in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Targeting the Inside of Cells with Biologicals: Toxin Routes in a Therapeutic Context.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Construction of Human Immune and Naive scFv Phage Display Libraries.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther Veronika WenzelTechnische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany.
Margarita BosnakTechnische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany.
Robert TierneyNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Division of Bacteriology, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Maren SchubertTechnische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany.
Jeffrey BrownPETA International Science Consortium Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
Stefan DübelTechnische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-7390
Androulla EfstratiouWHO Collaborating Centre for Diphtheria and Streptococcal Infections, London, UK.
Dorothea SesardicNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Division of Bacteriology, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Paul Stickings *National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Division of Bacteriology, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Michael Hust *Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany. m.hust@tu-bs.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3418-6045
Technische Universität Braunschweig · DENational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diphtheria is an infectious disease caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae. The bacterium primarily infects the throat and upper airways and the produced diphtheria toxin (DT), which binds to the elongation factor 2 and blocks protein synthesis, can spread through the bloodstream and affect organs, such as the heart and kidneys. For more than 125 years, the therapy against diphtheria has been based on polyclonal horse sera directed against DT (diphtheria antitoxin; DAT). Animal sera have many disadvantages including serum sickness, batch-to-batch variation in quality and the use of animals for production. In this work, 400 human recombinant antibodies were generated against DT from two different phage display panning strategies using a human immune library. A panning in microtiter plates resulted in 22 unique in vitro neutralizing antibodies and a panning in solution combined with a functional neutralization screening resulted in 268 in vitro neutralizing antibodies. 61 unique antibodies were further characterized as scFv-Fc with 35 produced as fully human IgG1. The best in vitro neutralizing antibody showed an estimated relative potency of 454 IU/mg and minimal effective dose 50% (MED50%) of 3.0 pM at a constant amount of DT (4x minimal cytopathic dose) in the IgG format. The targeted domains of the 35 antibodies were analyzed by immunoblot and by epitope mapping using phage display. All three DT domains (enzymatic domain, translocation domain and receptor binding domain) are targets for neutralizing antibodies. When toxin neutralization assays were performed at higher toxin dose levels, the neutralizing capacity of individual antibodies was markedly reduced but this was largely compensated for by using two or more antibodies in combination, resulting in a potency of 79.4 IU/mg in the in vivo intradermal challenge assay. These recombinant antibody combinations are candidates for further clinical and regulatory development to replace equine DAT.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingCorynebacterium diphtheriaeDiphtheria ToxinEpitope MappingGuinea PigsHumansImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntradermalModels, MolecularPeptide Elongation Factor 2Peptide LibraryProtein ConformationSingle-Chain AntibodiesAntibodies, NeutralizingDiphtheria ToxinImmunoglobulin GPeptide Elongation Factor 2Peptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID31953428
PMCPMC6969050
OpenAlexW2998834695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.