Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Monitoring canid scent marking in space and time using a biologging and machine learning approach.

Owen R Bidder, Agustina di Virgilio, Jennifer S Hunter, Alex McInturff, Kaitlyn M Gaynor, Alison M Smith, Janelle Dorcy, Frank Rosell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Owen R BidderDepartment for Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America. o.r.bidder@gmail.com.
Agustina di VirgilioGrupo de Ecología Cuantitativa, INIBIOMA (UnComa-CONICET), Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.
Jennifer S HunterDepartment for Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
Alex McInturffDepartment for Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
Kaitlyn M GaynorDepartment for Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5747-0543
Alison M SmithHopland Research and Extension Center, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, California, United States of America.
Janelle DorcyDepartment for Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
Frank RosellFaculty of Technology, Natural Sciences, and Maritime Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø i Telemark, Norway. Frank.Rosell@usn.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For canid species, scent marking plays a critical role in territoriality, social dynamics, and reproduction. However, due in part to human dependence on vision as our primary sensory modality, research on olfactory communication is hampered by a lack of tractable methods. In this study, we leverage a powerful biologging approach, using accelerometers in concert with GPS loggers to monitor and describe scent-marking events in time and space. We performed a validation experiment with domestic dogs, monitoring them by video concurrently with the novel biologging approach. We attached an accelerometer to the pelvis of 31 dogs (19 males and 12 females), detecting raised-leg and squat posture urinations by monitoring the change in device orientation. We then deployed this technique to describe the scent marking activity of 3 guardian dogs as they defend livestock from coyote depredation in California, providing an example use-case for the technique. During validation, the algorithm correctly classified 92% of accelerometer readings. High performance was partly due to the conspicuous signatures of archetypal raised-leg postures in the accelerometer data. Accuracy did not vary with the weight, age, and sex of the dogs, resulting in a method that is broadly applicable across canid species' morphologies. We also used models trained on each individual to detect scent marking of others to emulate the use of captive surrogates for model training. We observed no relationship between the similarity in body weight between the dog pairs and the overall accuracy of predictions, although models performed best when trained and tested on the same individual. We discuss how existing methods in the field of movement ecology can be extended to use this exciting new data type. This paper represents an important first step in opening new avenues of research by leveraging the power of modern-technologies and machine-learning to this field.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaliforniaDogsFemaleGeographic Information SystemsMachine LearningMaleSmellTerritorialityWireless Technology

Identifiers

PMID31953418
PMCPMC6969016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.