ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Effect of Switching from a Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol to a Modified Ultra-Long Protocol Among Women Who Had 1 Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Failure Verses Those Who Had 2 PPOS Failures.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Efficacy of three COS protocols and predictability of AMH and AFC in women with discordant ovarian reserve markers: a retrospective study on 19,239 patients.Journal of ovarian research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little research on whether normoresponsive patients who produced poor-quality embryos once verses those who produced poor-quality embryos twice when using a single COH protocol should change to a different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we enrolled 108 patients with 1 PPOS failure who chose to continue receiving the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol (n=61) versus those who decided to switch to the modified ultra-long protocol (n=47). We also enrolled 131 normoresponsive patients with 2 PPOS failures who chose to continue receiving the PPOS protocol (n=60) versus those who decided to switch to the modified ultra-long protocol (n=71) in the third cycle. RESULTS We found no significant difference in clinical outcomes of patients with 1 PPOS failure who continued using the PPOS protocol verses those who switched to the modified ultra-long protocol in the second cycle, expect for a lower cancelation rate (4.3% vs. 16.4%). However, the patients with 2 PPOS failures had significantly more good-quality embryos (0.9 vs. 0.4), more viable embryos (1.8 vs. 0.9), lower cancelation rates (18.3% vs. 53.3%), and higher pregnancy rates per aspirated cycle (26.8% vs. 10.0%) when switching to the modified ultra-long protocol compared to those who decided to continue receiving the PPOS protocol (P<0.05). Furthermore, the odds of clinical pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 5.997, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.476-24.361, P=0.01) were positively associated with switching to the COH protocol in the third cycle. CONCLUSIONS For normoresponsive patients with poor-quality embryos when using the PPOS protocol, switching to the modified ultra-long protocol after having 2 PPOS failures was associated with better ART outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.