Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31953323›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2020

Protein secondary structure determines the temporal relationship between folding and disulfide formation.

Philip J Robinson, Shingo Kanemura, Xiaofei Cao, Neil J Bulleid

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Translation Rates and Protein Folding.Journal of molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Calcium dysregulation potentiates wild-type myocilin misfolding: implications for glaucoma pathogenesis.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip J RobinsonInstitute of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Shingo KanemuraKwansei Gakuin University, 2-1 Gakuen, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan.
Xiaofei CaoInstitute of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Neil J BulleidInstitute of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: neil.bulleid@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Glasgow · GBKwansei Gakuin University · JP

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D00764X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How and when disulfide bonds form in proteins relative to the stage of their folding is a fundamental question in cell biology. Two models describe this relationship: the folded precursor model, in which a nascent structure forms before disulfides do, and the quasi-stochastic model, where disulfides form prior to folding. Here we investigated oxidative folding of three structurally diverse substrates, β2-microglobulin, prolactin, and the disintegrin domain of ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 (ADAM10), to understand how these mechanisms apply in a cellular context. We used a eukaryotic cell-free translation system in which we could identify disulfide isomers in stalled translation intermediates to characterize the timing of disulfide formation relative to translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum and the presence of non-native disulfides. Our results indicate that in a domain lacking secondary structure, disulfides form before conformational folding through a process prone to nonnative disulfide formation, whereas in proteins with defined secondary structure, native disulfide formation occurs after partial folding. These findings reveal that the nascent protein structure promotes correct disulfide formation during cotranslational folding.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingADAM10 ProteinAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAnimalsbeta 2-MicroglobulinCattleCysteineDisulfidesEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProlactinProtein DomainsProtein Structure, SecondaryRibosomesADAM10 ProteinADAM10 protein, humanAmyloid Precursor Protein Secretasesbeta 2-MicroglobulinCysteineDisulfidesMembrane ProteinsProlactindisulfideendoplasmic reticulum (ER)folded precursor modelnascent chainprotein disulfide isomeraseprotein foldingprotein homeostasisprotein secretionprotein structureprotein translocationquasi-stochastic model

Identifiers

PMID31953323
PMCPMC7039548
OpenAlexW2998974209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.